Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Ten steps toward a better personality science – how quality may be rewarded more in research evaluation
Authors: Leising, Daniel
Thielmann, Isabel
Glöckner, Andreas
Gärtner, Anne
Schönbrodt, Felix
Issue Date: 8-Jul-2021
Publisher: PsychArchives
Abstract: We point out ten steps that we think will go a long way in improving personality science. The first five steps focus on fostering consensus regarding (1) research goals, (2) terminology, (3) measurement practices, (4) data handling, and (5) the current state of theory and evidence. The other five steps focus on improving the credibility of empirical research, through (6) formal modelling, (7) mandatory pre-registration for confirmatory claims, (8) replication as a routine practice, (9) planning for informative studies (e.g., in terms of statistical power), and (10) making data, analysis scripts, and materials openly available. The current, quantity-based incentive structures in academia clearly stand in the way of implementing many of these practices, resulting in a research literature with sometimes questionable utility and/or integrity. As a solution, we propose a quality-based reward scheme that explicitly weights published research by its Good Science merits. Scientists need to be increasingly rewarded for doing good work, not just lots of work.
Citation: Leising, D., Thielmann, I., Glöckner, A., Gärtner, A., & Schönbrodt, F. (in press). Ten steps toward a better personality science – How quality may be rewarded more in research evaluation [Author accepted manuscript]. Personality Science.
Appears in Collections:Article

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Leising_Thielmann_Glöckner_et_al._2021_Ten Steps Toward_PS_AAM.pdf
Public UseCC-BY 4.0
Author Accepted Manuscript542,77 kBAdobe PDFDownload