Supplementary materials [Review] to: Ten steps toward a better personality science: How quality may be rewarded more in research evaluation
Editor(s)
Personality Science
Abstract / Description
Supplementary materials [Review] to: Leising, D., Thielmann, I., Glöckner, A., Gärtner, A., & Schönbrodt, F. (2022). Ten steps toward a better personality science: How quality may be rewarded more in research evaluation. Personality Science, 3, Article e6029. https://doi.org/10.5964/ps.6029
Keyword(s)
reproducibility credibility research evaluation assessment quality metrics publicationPersistent Identifier
Date of first publication
2022
Publisher
PsychOpen GOLD
Is referenced by
Citation
Personality Science. (Ed.) (2022). Supplementary materials to: Ten steps toward a better personality science: How quality may be rewarded more in research evaluation [Open peer-review]. PsychOpen GOLD. https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.5652
-
Leising_et_al_2022_Personality_Science_Quality_SUPPL_Open_Peer_Review.pdfAdobe PDF - 377.59KBMD5: 87268249184662bdd61a9869f28226d7Description: Open Peer Review
-
There are no other versions of this object.
-
Editor(s)Personality Science
-
PsychArchives acquisition timestamp2022-03-28T13:28:55Z
-
Made available on2022-03-28T13:28:55Z
-
Date of first publication2022
-
Abstract / DescriptionSupplementary materials [Review] to: Leising, D., Thielmann, I., Glöckner, A., Gärtner, A., & Schönbrodt, F. (2022). Ten steps toward a better personality science: How quality may be rewarded more in research evaluation. Personality Science, 3, Article e6029. https://doi.org/10.5964/ps.6029en_US
-
CitationPersonality Science. (Ed.) (2022). Supplementary materials to: Ten steps toward a better personality science: How quality may be rewarded more in research evaluation [Open peer-review]. PsychOpen GOLD. https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.5652en_US
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/5050
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.5652
-
Language of contentengen_US
-
PublisherPsychOpen GOLDen_US
-
Is referenced byhttps://doi.org/10.5964/ps.6029
-
Is related tohttps://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.12453
-
Is related tohttps://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.4963
-
Keyword(s)reproducibilityen_US
-
Keyword(s)credibilityen_US
-
Keyword(s)research evaluationen_US
-
Keyword(s)assessmenten_US
-
Keyword(s)qualityen_US
-
Keyword(s)metricsen_US
-
Keyword(s)publicationen_US
-
Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)150
-
TitleSupplementary materials [Review] to: Ten steps toward a better personality science: How quality may be rewarded more in research evaluationen_US
-
DRO typeotheren_US
-
Visible tag(s)Open Peer Review