Article Version of Record

Not toeing the number line for simple arithmetic: Two large-n conceptual replications of Mathieu et al. (Cognition, 2016, Experiment 1)

Author(s) / Creator(s)

Campbell, Jamie I. D.
Chen, Yalin
Azhar, Maham

Abstract / Description

We conducted two conceptual replications of Experiment 1 in Mathieu, Gourjon, Couderc, Thevenot, and Prado (2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.10.002). They tested a sample of 34 French adults on mixed-operation blocks of single-digit addition (4 + 3) and subtraction (4 – 3) with the three problem elements (O1, +/-, O2) presented sequentially. Addition was 34 ms faster if O2 appeared 300 ms after the operation sign and displaced 5° to the right of central fixation, whereas subtraction was 19 ms faster when O2 was displaced to the left. Replication Experiment 1 (n = 74 recruited at the University of Saskatchewan) used the same non-zero addition and subtraction problems and trial event sequence as Mathieu et al., but participants completed blocks of pure addition and pure subtraction followed by the mixed-operation condition used by Mathieu et al. Addition RT showed a 32 ms advantage with O2 shifted rightward relative to leftward but only in mixed-operation blocks. There was no effect of O2 position on subtraction RT. Experiment 2 (n = 74) was the same except mixed-operation blocks occurred before the pure-operation blocks. There was an overall 13 ms advantage with O2 shifted right relative to leftward but no interaction with operation or with mixture (i.e., pure vs mixed operations). Nonetheless, the rightward RT advantage was statistically significant for both addition and subtraction only in mixed-operation blocks. Taken together with the robust effects of mixture in Experiment 1, the results suggest that O2 position effects in this paradigm might reflect task specific demands associated with mixed operations.

Keyword(s)

replication simple addition and subtraction spatial attention

Persistent Identifier

Date of first publication

2021-11-30

Journal title

Journal of Numerical Cognition

Volume

7

Issue

3

Page numbers

248–258

Publisher

PsychOpen GOLD

Publication status

publishedVersion

Review status

peerReviewed

Is version of

Citation

Campbell, J. I. D., Chen, Y., & Azhar, M. (2021). Not toeing the number line for simple arithmetic: Two large-n conceptual replications of Mathieu et al. (Cognition, 2016, Experiment 1). Journal of Numerical Cognition, 7(3), 248-258. https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.6051
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Campbell, Jamie I. D.
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Chen, Yalin
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Azhar, Maham
  • PsychArchives acquisition timestamp
    2022-04-14T11:22:03Z
  • Made available on
    2022-04-14T11:22:03Z
  • Date of first publication
    2021-11-30
  • Abstract / Description
    We conducted two conceptual replications of Experiment 1 in Mathieu, Gourjon, Couderc, Thevenot, and Prado (2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.10.002). They tested a sample of 34 French adults on mixed-operation blocks of single-digit addition (4 + 3) and subtraction (4 – 3) with the three problem elements (O1, +/-, O2) presented sequentially. Addition was 34 ms faster if O2 appeared 300 ms after the operation sign and displaced 5° to the right of central fixation, whereas subtraction was 19 ms faster when O2 was displaced to the left. Replication Experiment 1 (n = 74 recruited at the University of Saskatchewan) used the same non-zero addition and subtraction problems and trial event sequence as Mathieu et al., but participants completed blocks of pure addition and pure subtraction followed by the mixed-operation condition used by Mathieu et al. Addition RT showed a 32 ms advantage with O2 shifted rightward relative to leftward but only in mixed-operation blocks. There was no effect of O2 position on subtraction RT. Experiment 2 (n = 74) was the same except mixed-operation blocks occurred before the pure-operation blocks. There was an overall 13 ms advantage with O2 shifted right relative to leftward but no interaction with operation or with mixture (i.e., pure vs mixed operations). Nonetheless, the rightward RT advantage was statistically significant for both addition and subtraction only in mixed-operation blocks. Taken together with the robust effects of mixture in Experiment 1, the results suggest that O2 position effects in this paradigm might reflect task specific demands associated with mixed operations.
    en_US
  • Publication status
    publishedVersion
  • Review status
    peerReviewed
  • Citation
    Campbell, J. I. D., Chen, Y., & Azhar, M. (2021). Not toeing the number line for simple arithmetic: Two large-n conceptual replications of Mathieu et al. (Cognition, 2016, Experiment 1). Journal of Numerical Cognition, 7(3), 248-258. https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.6051
    en_US
  • ISSN
    2363-8761
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/5500
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.6104
  • Language of content
    eng
  • Publisher
    PsychOpen GOLD
  • Is version of
    https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.6051
  • Is version of
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.4953
  • Is related to
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.5221
  • Is related to
    https://osf.io/9b45h/
  • Is related to
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.4953
  • Keyword(s)
    replication
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    simple addition and subtraction
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    spatial attention
    en_US
  • Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)
    150
  • Title
    Not toeing the number line for simple arithmetic: Two large-n conceptual replications of Mathieu et al. (Cognition, 2016, Experiment 1)
    en_US
  • DRO type
    article
  • Issue
    3
  • Journal title
    Journal of Numerical Cognition
  • Page numbers
    248–258
  • Volume
    7
  • Visible tag(s)
    Version of Record
    en_US