Research Data

Dataset for: Habituation in Predictability-Modulations of Stimulus-Response Binding

Author(s) / Creator(s)

Schmalbrock, Philip
Theeuwes, Jan
Frings, Christian

Abstract / Description

Acting intentionally requires the integration of perceptual information with action processes in a common representational format. In the action control literature, this integrated representation is often called event file and is measured in so-called stimulus-response binding effects. These effects allow us to measure the strength of this shared representation and the impact it can have on behavior. A well-established finding is that the size of binding effects can be modulated by different variables. One recently discovered modulator is stimulus predictability: If perceptual information is perfectly predictable, stimulus-response binding effects diminish. Yet, the concrete mechanism of why predictability diminishes stimulus-response binding effects remained elusive so far. In the present study (N = 234), we compared two possible explanations for these modulation effects, namely habituation versus statistical learning. We found that it is unlikely that the predictability modulation is explained by habituation. Rather, we found evidence supporting the learning of statistical regularities as an explanation. Our study thus adds to recent attempts to more closely relate learning mechanisms and action control.

Persistent Identifier

Date of first publication

2024-04-29

Publisher

PsychArchives

Citation

  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Schmalbrock, Philip
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Theeuwes, Jan
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Frings, Christian
  • PsychArchives acquisition timestamp
    2024-04-29T09:57:26Z
  • Made available on
    2024-04-29T09:57:26Z
  • Date of first publication
    2024-04-29
  • Abstract / Description
    Acting intentionally requires the integration of perceptual information with action processes in a common representational format. In the action control literature, this integrated representation is often called event file and is measured in so-called stimulus-response binding effects. These effects allow us to measure the strength of this shared representation and the impact it can have on behavior. A well-established finding is that the size of binding effects can be modulated by different variables. One recently discovered modulator is stimulus predictability: If perceptual information is perfectly predictable, stimulus-response binding effects diminish. Yet, the concrete mechanism of why predictability diminishes stimulus-response binding effects remained elusive so far. In the present study (N = 234), we compared two possible explanations for these modulation effects, namely habituation versus statistical learning. We found that it is unlikely that the predictability modulation is explained by habituation. Rather, we found evidence supporting the learning of statistical regularities as an explanation. Our study thus adds to recent attempts to more closely relate learning mechanisms and action control.
    en
  • Review status
    unknown
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/9920
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.14467
  • Language of content
    eng
  • Publisher
    PsychArchives
  • Is related to
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.8396
  • Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)
    150
  • Title
    Dataset for: Habituation in Predictability-Modulations of Stimulus-Response Binding
    en
  • DRO type
    researchData