Research Data

Dataset for: Predictability Reduces the Event-file Retrieval

Author(s) / Creator(s)

Schmalbrock, Philip
Hommel, Bernhard
Münchau, Alexander
Beste, Christian
Frings, Christian

Abstract / Description

Dataset for: Schmalbrock, P., Hommel, B., Münchau, A., Beste, C., & Frings, C. (2022). Predictability Reduces the Event-file Retrieval. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-022-02637-6
There is growing consensus that stimulus–response bindings (event files) play a central role in human action control. Here, we investigated how the integration and the retrieval of event files are affected by the predictability of stimulus components of event files. We used the distractor–response binding paradigm, in which nominally task-irrelevant distractors are repeated or alternated from a prime to a probe display. The typical outcome of these kinds of tasks is that the effects of distractor repetition and response repetition interact: Performance is worse if the distractor repeats but the response does not, or vice versa. This partial-repetition effect was reduced when the distractor was highly predictable (Experiment 1). Separate manipulations of distractor predictability in the prime and probe trial revealed that this pattern was only replicated if the probe distractors were predictable (Experiment 2b, 3), but not if prime distractors were predictable (Experiment 2a). This suggests that stimulus predictability does not affect the integration of distractor information into event files, but the retrieval of these files when one or more of the integrated features are repeated. We take our findings to support theoretical claims that integration and retrieval of event files might differ concerning their sensitivity to top-down factors.

Keyword(s)

distractor-response binding predictability S–R binding Predictability Curiosity

Persistent Identifier

Date of first publication

2022-11-07

Publisher

PsychArchives

Is referenced by

Citation

  • 2
    2022-11-07
    During the review process of the manuscript, an additional experiment with complementary data and analysis was added (see Experiment 3 in the manuscript).
  • 1
    2022-03-22
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Schmalbrock, Philip
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Hommel, Bernhard
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Münchau, Alexander
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Beste, Christian
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Frings, Christian
  • PsychArchives acquisition timestamp
    2022-11-07T10:08:27Z
  • Made available on
    2022-03-22T13:36:36Z
  • Made available on
    2022-11-07T10:08:27Z
  • Date of first publication
    2022-11-07
  • Abstract / Description
    Dataset for: Schmalbrock, P., Hommel, B., Münchau, A., Beste, C., & Frings, C. (2022). Predictability Reduces the Event-file Retrieval. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-022-02637-6
    en_US
  • Abstract / Description
    There is growing consensus that stimulus–response bindings (event files) play a central role in human action control. Here, we investigated how the integration and the retrieval of event files are affected by the predictability of stimulus components of event files. We used the distractor–response binding paradigm, in which nominally task-irrelevant distractors are repeated or alternated from a prime to a probe display. The typical outcome of these kinds of tasks is that the effects of distractor repetition and response repetition interact: Performance is worse if the distractor repeats but the response does not, or vice versa. This partial-repetition effect was reduced when the distractor was highly predictable (Experiment 1). Separate manipulations of distractor predictability in the prime and probe trial revealed that this pattern was only replicated if the probe distractors were predictable (Experiment 2b, 3), but not if prime distractors were predictable (Experiment 2a). This suggests that stimulus predictability does not affect the integration of distractor information into event files, but the retrieval of these files when one or more of the integrated features are repeated. We take our findings to support theoretical claims that integration and retrieval of event files might differ concerning their sensitivity to top-down factors.
    en
  • Review status
    unknown
    en
  • Sponsorship
    Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. The Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) supported the research reported in this article (FR2133/15-1).
    en_US
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/5035.2
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.8396
  • Language of content
    eng
    en_US
  • Publisher
    PsychArchives
    en_US
  • Is referenced by
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-022-02637-6
  • Is related to
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-022-02637-6
  • Is related to
    https://www.psycharchives.org/handle/20.500.12034/9920
  • Keyword(s)
    distractor-response binding
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    predictability
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    S–R binding
    en
  • Keyword(s)
    Predictability
    en
  • Keyword(s)
    Curiosity
    en
  • Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)
    150
  • Title
    Dataset for: Predictability Reduces the Event-file Retrieval
    en_US
  • DRO type
    researchData
    en_US