Preregistration

Pierced, tattooed, but manic?! - The influence of prototypicality on the diagnosis of borderline personality disorder and bipolar disorder

Author(s) / Creator(s)

Beermann, Jana
Von Brachel, Ruth
Hirschfeld, Gerrit
Bonnin, Gabriel
Jagemann, Inga
Schneider, Silvia

Abstract / Description

Kröber et al. (2023) have exploratively identified which diagnostically relevant and -irrelevant features characterize psychotherapists’ prototypes of selected mental disorders. This study builds on their work and examines the extent to which prototypicality affects the diagnosis of borderline personality disorder (BPD) and mania compared with the official diagnostic criteria. We aim to involve a total of 100 psychotherapists (in training) and psychiatrists. They will be recruited via our training center for psychotherapy and the Chamber of Psychotherapists (https://www.ptk-nrw.de/, 2025). We aim to employ a conjoint analysis to investigate the causal effects of several prototypical and peripheral criteria and features in a patient on the diagnosis of BPD and mania. We apply mixed regression models with a random intercept to calculate utilities. We test for differences in utilities by applying an ANOVA and subsequent planned pairwise comparisons. A Wald test is applied to test utility significance.

Keyword(s)

prototype representative heuristics borderline personality disorder bipolar disorder conjoint analysis diagnostics

Persistent Identifier

PsychArchives acquisition timestamp

2025-07-15 11:10:10 UTC

Publisher

PsychArchives

Citation

  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Beermann, Jana
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Von Brachel, Ruth
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Hirschfeld, Gerrit
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Bonnin, Gabriel
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Jagemann, Inga
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Schneider, Silvia
  • PsychArchives acquisition timestamp
    2025-07-15T11:10:10Z
  • Made available on
    2025-07-15T11:10:10Z
  • Date of first publication
    2025-07-15
  • Abstract / Description
    Kröber et al. (2023) have exploratively identified which diagnostically relevant and -irrelevant features characterize psychotherapists’ prototypes of selected mental disorders. This study builds on their work and examines the extent to which prototypicality affects the diagnosis of borderline personality disorder (BPD) and mania compared with the official diagnostic criteria. We aim to involve a total of 100 psychotherapists (in training) and psychiatrists. They will be recruited via our training center for psychotherapy and the Chamber of Psychotherapists (https://www.ptk-nrw.de/, 2025). We aim to employ a conjoint analysis to investigate the causal effects of several prototypical and peripheral criteria and features in a patient on the diagnosis of BPD and mania. We apply mixed regression models with a random intercept to calculate utilities. We test for differences in utilities by applying an ANOVA and subsequent planned pairwise comparisons. A Wald test is applied to test utility significance.
    en
  • Publication status
    other
  • Review status
    unknown
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/12259
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.16855
  • Language of content
    eng
  • Publisher
    PsychArchives
  • Keyword(s)
    prototype
  • Keyword(s)
    representative heuristics
  • Keyword(s)
    borderline personality disorder
  • Keyword(s)
    bipolar disorder
  • Keyword(s)
    conjoint analysis
  • Keyword(s)
    diagnostics
  • Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)
    150
  • Title
    Pierced, tattooed, but manic?! - The influence of prototypicality on the diagnosis of borderline personality disorder and bipolar disorder
    en
  • DRO type
    preregistration
  • Visible tag(s)
    PRP-QUANT