Pierced, tattooed, but manic?! - The influence of prototypicality on the diagnosis of borderline personality disorder and bipolar disorder
Author(s) / Creator(s)
Beermann, Jana
Von Brachel, Ruth
Hirschfeld, Gerrit
Bonnin, Gabriel
Jagemann, Inga
Schneider, Silvia
Abstract / Description
Kröber et al. (2023) have exploratively identified which diagnostically relevant and -irrelevant features characterize psychotherapists’ prototypes of selected mental disorders. This study builds on their work and examines the extent to which prototypicality affects the diagnosis of borderline personality disorder (BPD) and mania compared with the official diagnostic criteria. We aim to involve a total of 100 psychotherapists (in training) and psychiatrists. They will be recruited via our training center for psychotherapy and the Chamber of Psychotherapists (https://www.ptk-nrw.de/, 2025). We aim to employ a conjoint analysis to investigate the causal effects of several prototypical and peripheral criteria and features in a patient on the diagnosis of BPD and mania. We apply mixed regression models with a random intercept to calculate utilities. We test for differences in utilities by applying an ANOVA and subsequent planned pairwise comparisons. A Wald test is applied to test utility significance.
Keyword(s)
prototype representative heuristics borderline personality disorder bipolar disorder conjoint analysis diagnosticsPersistent Identifier
PsychArchives acquisition timestamp
2025-07-15 11:10:10 UTC
Publisher
PsychArchives
Citation
-
Präregistrierung_Beermann.pdfAdobe PDF - 130.27KBMD5 : 6ec9614ec5f037b9e7d428b5ec4e0a12
-
There are no other versions of this object.
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Beermann, Jana
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Von Brachel, Ruth
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Hirschfeld, Gerrit
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Bonnin, Gabriel
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Jagemann, Inga
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Schneider, Silvia
-
PsychArchives acquisition timestamp2025-07-15T11:10:10Z
-
Made available on2025-07-15T11:10:10Z
-
Date of first publication2025-07-15
-
Abstract / DescriptionKröber et al. (2023) have exploratively identified which diagnostically relevant and -irrelevant features characterize psychotherapists’ prototypes of selected mental disorders. This study builds on their work and examines the extent to which prototypicality affects the diagnosis of borderline personality disorder (BPD) and mania compared with the official diagnostic criteria. We aim to involve a total of 100 psychotherapists (in training) and psychiatrists. They will be recruited via our training center for psychotherapy and the Chamber of Psychotherapists (https://www.ptk-nrw.de/, 2025). We aim to employ a conjoint analysis to investigate the causal effects of several prototypical and peripheral criteria and features in a patient on the diagnosis of BPD and mania. We apply mixed regression models with a random intercept to calculate utilities. We test for differences in utilities by applying an ANOVA and subsequent planned pairwise comparisons. A Wald test is applied to test utility significance.en
-
Publication statusother
-
Review statusunknown
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/12259
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.16855
-
Language of contenteng
-
PublisherPsychArchives
-
Keyword(s)prototype
-
Keyword(s)representative heuristics
-
Keyword(s)borderline personality disorder
-
Keyword(s)bipolar disorder
-
Keyword(s)conjoint analysis
-
Keyword(s)diagnostics
-
Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)150
-
TitlePierced, tattooed, but manic?! - The influence of prototypicality on the diagnosis of borderline personality disorder and bipolar disorderen
-
DRO typepreregistration
-
Visible tag(s)PRP-QUANT