The Impact of Language Control State on Cognate Facilitation: What Happens to the L1? (Part 2)
Author(s) / Creator(s)
Benini, Elena
Roembke, Tanja
Moretti, Luca
Abstract / Description
Cognates are translation-equivalent words that are similar or even identical across languages in phonological and orthographic form. Previous research has shown that pictures of cognates are more easily named by bilinguals than non-cognates. However, such cognate facilitation may depend on the exact task demands and language control state a bilingual is in. To investigate further the mechanisms of cognate facilitation, we conducted Experiment 1 (preregistration: https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.14636) where we manipulated the frequency of cognates versus non-cognates within blocks of a L2 picture naming task. Consistent with our hypotheses, we found larger cognate facilitation in blocks with more cognates. In a follow-up (Experiment 2, preregistration: https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.16058), it was our goal 1) to replicate the observed larger cognate facilitation in majority cognate blocks and 2) to better understand the underlying cognitive mechanism behind it. To do the latter, participants additionally engaged in a diagnostic task designed to measure L1 activation. This diagnostic task was a L1 fragment completion task between L2 naming blocks, which included “old” (translations of non-cognate words included in the L2 naming blocks) and “new” words, to measure how activation of L1 words may be adjusted during L2 naming in majority cognate vs. majority non-cognate blocks. In this experiment (Experiment 3), we use a similar approach with the exception that, as a diagnostic task, participants now complete a L1 picture naming task in-between the L2 ones. To-be-named pictures will again be of “old” and “new” non-cognate concepts. As before, we make predictions as to how L1 production of “old” and “new” words should differ, depending on the presumed underlying cognitive control processes (e.g., word-specific L1 inhibition or activation).
Keyword(s)
Picture naming cognates proportion congruency cognate facilitation bilingualism proactive language controlPersistent Identifier
PsychArchives acquisition timestamp
2025-06-10 19:00:03 UTC
Publisher
PsychArchives
Citation
-
CoPro_Preregistration_Exp3_v1.pdfAdobe PDF - 231.71KBMD5 : eed11d63311dc0d8650904cc8e92c6e5Description: preregistration exp 3
-
There are no other versions of this object.
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Benini, Elena
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Roembke, Tanja
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Moretti, Luca
-
PsychArchives acquisition timestamp2025-06-10T19:00:03Z
-
Made available on2025-06-10T19:00:03Z
-
Date of first publication2025-06-10
-
Abstract / DescriptionCognates are translation-equivalent words that are similar or even identical across languages in phonological and orthographic form. Previous research has shown that pictures of cognates are more easily named by bilinguals than non-cognates. However, such cognate facilitation may depend on the exact task demands and language control state a bilingual is in. To investigate further the mechanisms of cognate facilitation, we conducted Experiment 1 (preregistration: https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.14636) where we manipulated the frequency of cognates versus non-cognates within blocks of a L2 picture naming task. Consistent with our hypotheses, we found larger cognate facilitation in blocks with more cognates. In a follow-up (Experiment 2, preregistration: https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.16058), it was our goal 1) to replicate the observed larger cognate facilitation in majority cognate blocks and 2) to better understand the underlying cognitive mechanism behind it. To do the latter, participants additionally engaged in a diagnostic task designed to measure L1 activation. This diagnostic task was a L1 fragment completion task between L2 naming blocks, which included “old” (translations of non-cognate words included in the L2 naming blocks) and “new” words, to measure how activation of L1 words may be adjusted during L2 naming in majority cognate vs. majority non-cognate blocks. In this experiment (Experiment 3), we use a similar approach with the exception that, as a diagnostic task, participants now complete a L1 picture naming task in-between the L2 ones. To-be-named pictures will again be of “old” and “new” non-cognate concepts. As before, we make predictions as to how L1 production of “old” and “new” words should differ, depending on the presumed underlying cognitive control processes (e.g., word-specific L1 inhibition or activation).en
-
Publication statusother
-
Review statusunknown
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/11853
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.16446
-
Language of contenteng
-
PublisherPsychArchives
-
Keyword(s)Picture naming
-
Keyword(s)cognates
-
Keyword(s)proportion congruency
-
Keyword(s)cognate facilitation
-
Keyword(s)bilingualism
-
Keyword(s)proactive language control
-
Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)150
-
TitleThe Impact of Language Control State on Cognate Facilitation: What Happens to the L1? (Part 2)en
-
DRO typepreregistration
-
Visible tag(s)PRP-QUANT