A framework for planning sample sizes regarding prediction intervals of the normal mean using R shiny apps
Author(s) / Creator(s)
Luh, Wei-Ming
Guo, Jiin-Huarng
Abstract / Description
Replication is a core principle for research, and the recent recognition of the importance of constructing prediction intervals for precise replications highlights the need for robust sample-size planning methodologies. However, methodological and technical complexities often hinder researchers from efficiently achieving this task. This study addresses this challenge by developing five R Shiny apps specifically tailored to determine sample sizes concerning prediction intervals for the mean of the normal distribution. Two measures of precision, absolute and relative widths, are considered. Additionally, the apps consider unequal sampling unit costs and sample size allocations to achieve optimal results by exhaustive search. Simulation results validate the proposed methodology, demonstrating favorable coverage rates. Two illustrative examples of one-sample and two-sample problems showcase these apps’ versatility and user-friendly nature, providing researchers with a valid and straightforward approach for systematically planning sample sizes.
Keyword(s)
allocation ratio absolute width relative width sampling cost optimal sample size allocation replicabilityPersistent Identifier
Date of first publication
2024-12-23
Journal title
Methodology
Volume
20
Issue
4
Page numbers
283–303
Publisher
PsychOpen GOLD
Publication status
publishedVersion
Review status
peerReviewed
Is version of
Citation
Luh, W. & Guo, J. (2024). A framework for planning sample sizes regarding prediction intervals of the normal mean using R shiny apps. Methodology, 20(4), 283-303. https://doi.org/10.5964/meth.13549
-
meth.v20i4.13549.pdfAdobe PDF - 1.3MBMD5 : 939ac1f40396a0959259e633758ec380
-
There are no other versions of this object.
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Luh, Wei-Ming
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Guo, Jiin-Huarng
-
PsychArchives acquisition timestamp2025-04-25T11:32:57Z
-
Made available on2025-04-25T11:32:57Z
-
Date of first publication2024-12-23
-
Abstract / DescriptionReplication is a core principle for research, and the recent recognition of the importance of constructing prediction intervals for precise replications highlights the need for robust sample-size planning methodologies. However, methodological and technical complexities often hinder researchers from efficiently achieving this task. This study addresses this challenge by developing five R Shiny apps specifically tailored to determine sample sizes concerning prediction intervals for the mean of the normal distribution. Two measures of precision, absolute and relative widths, are considered. Additionally, the apps consider unequal sampling unit costs and sample size allocations to achieve optimal results by exhaustive search. Simulation results validate the proposed methodology, demonstrating favorable coverage rates. Two illustrative examples of one-sample and two-sample problems showcase these apps’ versatility and user-friendly nature, providing researchers with a valid and straightforward approach for systematically planning sample sizes.en_US
-
Publication statuspublishedVersion
-
Review statuspeerReviewed
-
CitationLuh, W. & Guo, J. (2024). A framework for planning sample sizes regarding prediction intervals of the normal mean using R shiny apps. Methodology, 20(4), 283-303. https://doi.org/10.5964/meth.13549
-
ISSN1614-2241
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/11695
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.16283
-
Language of contenteng
-
PublisherPsychOpen GOLD
-
Is version ofhttps://doi.org/10.5964/meth.13549
-
Keyword(s)allocation ratioen_US
-
Keyword(s)absolute widthen_US
-
Keyword(s)relative widthen_US
-
Keyword(s)sampling costen_US
-
Keyword(s)optimal sample size allocationen_US
-
Keyword(s)replicabilityen_US
-
Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)150
-
TitleA framework for planning sample sizes regarding prediction intervals of the normal mean using R shiny appsen_US
-
DRO typearticle
-
Issue4
-
Journal titleMethodology
-
Page numbers283–303
-
Volume20
-
Visible tag(s)Version of Record