Can task-set inhibition be modulated by short-term binding and retrieval in task switching? Assensing the effects of a task-irrelevant context.
Author(s) / Creator(s)
Benini, Elena
Abstract / Description
In task switching, performance in trial n is known to be influenced by whether the current task repeats versus switches from trial n-2. The typical result is worse performance in n-2 task repetitions compared to switches (i.e., n-2 repetition costs). N-2 repetition costs are ascribed to inhibition of the n-2 task set that needs to be overcome to select the same task set in trial n. In the recent years, however, it was suggested that n-2 repetition costs might be explained by episodic mismatch (i.e., feature binding and episodic retrieval processes) in trial n and n-2 in those trials in which the response switches between trial n-2 and trial n. Empirical evidence indeed supported this hypothesis showing larger n-2 repetition costs when the response switches from trial n-2 compared to when it repeats. N-2 repetition costs were nonetheless significant in response repetitions, indicating a residual role of task-set inhibition. In the present study, we assess whether the repetition of a task-irrelevant context can reduce n-2 repetition costs by retrieving the n-2 task set thus overcoming inhibition and increasing the match between trial n and n-2.
Keyword(s)
task switching feature binding episodic retrieval backward inhibition contextPersistent Identifier
PsychArchives acquisition timestamp
2024-07-11 17:15:30 UTC
Publisher
PsychArchives
Citation
-
prereg_OrangeBearsAdventure.pdfAdobe PDF - 432.03KBMD5 : 65f54458108a8a889381ce566c312ce2Description: preregistration
-
There are no other versions of this object.
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Benini, Elena
-
PsychArchives acquisition timestamp2024-07-11T17:15:30Z
-
Made available on2024-07-11T17:15:30Z
-
Date of first publication2024-07-11
-
Abstract / DescriptionIn task switching, performance in trial n is known to be influenced by whether the current task repeats versus switches from trial n-2. The typical result is worse performance in n-2 task repetitions compared to switches (i.e., n-2 repetition costs). N-2 repetition costs are ascribed to inhibition of the n-2 task set that needs to be overcome to select the same task set in trial n. In the recent years, however, it was suggested that n-2 repetition costs might be explained by episodic mismatch (i.e., feature binding and episodic retrieval processes) in trial n and n-2 in those trials in which the response switches between trial n-2 and trial n. Empirical evidence indeed supported this hypothesis showing larger n-2 repetition costs when the response switches from trial n-2 compared to when it repeats. N-2 repetition costs were nonetheless significant in response repetitions, indicating a residual role of task-set inhibition. In the present study, we assess whether the repetition of a task-irrelevant context can reduce n-2 repetition costs by retrieving the n-2 task set thus overcoming inhibition and increasing the match between trial n and n-2.en
-
Publication statusother
-
Review statusunknown
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/10599
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.15162
-
Language of contenteng
-
PublisherPsychArchives
-
Keyword(s)task switching
-
Keyword(s)feature binding
-
Keyword(s)episodic retrieval
-
Keyword(s)backward inhibition
-
Keyword(s)context
-
Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)150
-
TitleCan task-set inhibition be modulated by short-term binding and retrieval in task switching? Assensing the effects of a task-irrelevant context.en
-
DRO typepreregistration
-
Visible tag(s)PRP-QUANT