Other

Supplementary materials for: To Have the Best Interest at Heart: Analyzing the Match Between Laypersons' Interests and Publication Activity in Psychology

Author(s) / Creator(s)

Jonas, Mark
Bittermann, André
Chasiotis, Anita
Rosman, Tom

Abstract / Description

Supplementary materials for: Jonas, M., Bittermann, A., Chasiotis, A., & Rosman, T. (2022). To Have the Best Interest at Heart: Analyzing the Match Between Laypersons’ Interests and Publication Activity in Psychology. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.899430
There is a growing public interest in science and, by extension, in psychology, and human behavior. Yet, detailed investigations on whether academic psychological research activity matches lay interests are still scarce. In addition, while lay-friendly communication of research findings becomes continually more important, it is unclear which subfields of psychological research are particularly interesting to laypeople. To address these research gaps, we carried out an explorative study of psychological literature included in two large reference databases, one with a German (PSYNDEX) and one with an international (PsycInfo) scope. The years of 2018–2020 were scanned for articles belonging to one of 20 topic areas assessed as most interesting by lay participants in a previous study. We determined and compared the share of empirical research and research syntheses for each topic area and database and computed rank correlations between lay interest and academic publication volume. Results suggest a positive relationship between lay interest and academic publication activity specifically for research syntheses. Additionally, topic areas associated with clinical psychology offered a large share of research syntheses, while other topic areas such as “Psychodynamics” or “Industrial & Organizational Psychology” encompassed a smaller share of syntheses. Finally, we outline perspectives for long-term monitoring of psychology-related lay interests. Thus, the present study connects academic activity with the public interest in psychology by identifying and quantifying research syntheses for topics garnering the most lay interest.

Keyword(s)

topic interest research topics publication trends literature analysis lay summaries science communication research syntheses

Persistent Identifier

Date of first publication

2022-05-17

Publisher

PsychArchives

Is referenced by

Citation

  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Jonas, Mark
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Bittermann, André
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Chasiotis, Anita
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Rosman, Tom
  • Temporal coverage
    2018:2020
  • PsychArchives acquisition timestamp
    2022-05-17T07:34:35Z
  • Made available on
    2022-05-17T07:34:35Z
  • Date of first publication
    2022-05-17
  • Abstract / Description
    Supplementary materials for: Jonas, M., Bittermann, A., Chasiotis, A., & Rosman, T. (2022). To Have the Best Interest at Heart: Analyzing the Match Between Laypersons’ Interests and Publication Activity in Psychology. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.899430
    en
  • Abstract / Description
    There is a growing public interest in science and, by extension, in psychology, and human behavior. Yet, detailed investigations on whether academic psychological research activity matches lay interests are still scarce. In addition, while lay-friendly communication of research findings becomes continually more important, it is unclear which subfields of psychological research are particularly interesting to laypeople. To address these research gaps, we carried out an explorative study of psychological literature included in two large reference databases, one with a German (PSYNDEX) and one with an international (PsycInfo) scope. The years of 2018–2020 were scanned for articles belonging to one of 20 topic areas assessed as most interesting by lay participants in a previous study. We determined and compared the share of empirical research and research syntheses for each topic area and database and computed rank correlations between lay interest and academic publication volume. Results suggest a positive relationship between lay interest and academic publication activity specifically for research syntheses. Additionally, topic areas associated with clinical psychology offered a large share of research syntheses, while other topic areas such as “Psychodynamics” or “Industrial & Organizational Psychology” encompassed a smaller share of syntheses. Finally, we outline perspectives for long-term monitoring of psychology-related lay interests. Thus, the present study connects academic activity with the public interest in psychology by identifying and quantifying research syntheses for topics garnering the most lay interest.
    en
  • Publication status
    unknown
  • Review status
    unknown
  • Sponsorship
    This work was funded by internal ZPID funds. The authors received no third-party funding.
    en
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/5994
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.6678
  • Language of content
    eng
  • Publisher
    PsychArchives
  • Is referenced by
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.899430
  • Is related to
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.899430
  • Keyword(s)
    topic interest
    en
  • Keyword(s)
    research topics
    en
  • Keyword(s)
    publication trends
    en
  • Keyword(s)
    literature analysis
    en
  • Keyword(s)
    lay summaries
    en
  • Keyword(s)
    science communication
    en
  • Keyword(s)
    research syntheses
    en
  • Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)
    150
  • Title
    Supplementary materials for: To Have the Best Interest at Heart: Analyzing the Match Between Laypersons' Interests and Publication Activity in Psychology
    en
  • DRO type
    other
  • Leibniz institute name(s) / abbreviation(s)
    ZPID
  • Leibniz subject classification
    Psychologie