The degree of unexpectedness should be emphasized in neuroscience instead of novelty
Author(s) / Creator(s)
Reichardt, Richárd
Bertalan, Polner
Péter, Simor
Abstract / Description
This is a commentary on the article of Ogasawara et al., 2021 which was published in Nature Neuroscience. We suggest that the expected but not observed dopaminergic activity in response to novel stimuli in this experiment should not be expected.
Keyword(s)
novelty dopamine midbrainPersistent Identifier
Date of first publication
2022-02-23
Publisher
PsychArchives
Publication status
other
Review status
notReviewed
Citation
-
commentary_natnsci_rr.pdfAdobe PDF - 143.69KBMD5 : 2ebc85b7f850e3990b672b43f54fdd7aDescription: Rejected Commentary on Ogasawara et al., 2021 - NatNsci
-
There are no other versions of this object.
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Reichardt, Richárd
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Bertalan, Polner
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Péter, Simor
-
PsychArchives acquisition timestamp2022-02-23T09:27:21Z
-
Made available on2022-02-23T09:27:21Z
-
Date of first publication2022-02-23
-
Abstract / DescriptionThis is a commentary on the article of Ogasawara et al., 2021 which was published in Nature Neuroscience. We suggest that the expected but not observed dopaminergic activity in response to novel stimuli in this experiment should not be expected.en
-
Publication statusother
-
Review statusnotReviewed
-
ISSN-
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/4829
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.5424
-
Language of contenteng
-
PublisherPsychArchives
-
Is based onhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-021-00950-1
-
Keyword(s)noveltyen
-
Keyword(s)dopamineen
-
Keyword(s)midbrainen
-
Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)150
-
TitleThe degree of unexpectedness should be emphasized in neuroscience instead of noveltyen
-
DRO typearticle