Preregistration

Top-Down Modulation of Motor Priming by Belief About Animacy: A Registered Replication Report

Author(s) / Creator(s)

Cracco, Emiel
Liepelt, Roman
Brass, Marcel
Genschow, Oliver

Abstract / Description

Research has shown that people automatically imitate others and that this tendency is stronger when the other person is a human compared with a non-human agent. However, a controversial question is whether automatic imitation is also modulated by whether people believe the other person is a human. Although early research supported this hypothesis, not all studies reached the same conclusion and a recent meta-analysis found that there is currently neither evidence in favor nor against an influence of animacy beliefs on automatic imitation. One of the most prominent studies supporting such an influence is the study by Liepelt & Brass (2010), who found that automatic imitation was stronger when participants believed an ambiguous, gloved hand to be human, as opposed to wooden. In this registered report, including both original authors, we provide a high-powered replication of this study. By doing so, the current report contributes to answering the longstanding question of whether automatic imitation can be modulated by high-level social beliefs.

Keyword(s)

automatic imitation beliefs animacy

Persistent Identifier

PsychArchives acquisition timestamp

2021-08-16 14:15:31 UTC

Citation

Cracco, E., Liepelt, R., Brass, M., & Genschow, O. (2021). Top-Down Modulation of Motor Priming by Belief About Animacy: A Registered Replication Report. Leibniz Institut für Psychologie (ZPID). https://doi.org/10.23668/PSYCHARCHIVES.5052
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Cracco, Emiel
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Liepelt, Roman
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Brass, Marcel
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Genschow, Oliver
  • PsychArchives acquisition timestamp
    2021-08-16T14:15:31Z
  • Made available on
    2021-08-16T14:15:31Z
  • Date of first publication
    2021-08-16
  • Abstract / Description
    Research has shown that people automatically imitate others and that this tendency is stronger when the other person is a human compared with a non-human agent. However, a controversial question is whether automatic imitation is also modulated by whether people believe the other person is a human. Although early research supported this hypothesis, not all studies reached the same conclusion and a recent meta-analysis found that there is currently neither evidence in favor nor against an influence of animacy beliefs on automatic imitation. One of the most prominent studies supporting such an influence is the study by Liepelt & Brass (2010), who found that automatic imitation was stronger when participants believed an ambiguous, gloved hand to be human, as opposed to wooden. In this registered report, including both original authors, we provide a high-powered replication of this study. By doing so, the current report contributes to answering the longstanding question of whether automatic imitation can be modulated by high-level social beliefs.
    en_US
  • Publication status
    other
  • Citation
    Cracco, E., Liepelt, R., Brass, M., & Genschow, O. (2021). Top-Down Modulation of Motor Priming by Belief About Animacy: A Registered Replication Report. Leibniz Institut für Psychologie (ZPID). https://doi.org/10.23668/PSYCHARCHIVES.5052
    en
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/4477
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.5052
  • Language of content
    eng
    en_US
  • Is related to
    https://osf.io/v2wyu/
  • Keyword(s)
    automatic imitation
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    beliefs
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    animacy
    en_US
  • Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)
    150
  • Title
    Top-Down Modulation of Motor Priming by Belief About Animacy: A Registered Replication Report
    en_US
  • DRO type
    preregistration
    en_US