Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.4741
Title: Response Rates Differences Web vs. Other
Authors: Daikeler, Jessica
Issue Date: 26-Mar-2021
Publisher: PsychOpen CAMA
Abstract: Standardized CAMA dataset based on: Daikeler, J., Bosnjak, M., & Lozar Manfreda, K. (2020): Web versus other survey modes: An updated and extended meta-analysis comparing response rates. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 8, 513-539. https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smz008
Do web surveys still yield lower response rates compared with other survey modes? To answer this question, we replicated and extended a meta-analysis done in 2008 which found that, based on 45 experimental comparisons, web surveys had an 11 percentage points lower response rate compared with other survey modes. Fundamental changes in internet accessibility and use since the publication of the original meta-analysis would suggest that people’s propensity to participate in web surveys has changed considerably in the meantime. However, in our replication and extension study, which comprised 114 experimental comparisons between web and other survey modes, we found almost no change: web surveys still yielded lower response rates than other modes (a difference of 12 percentage points in response rates). Furthermore, we found that prenotifications, the sample recruitment strategy, the survey’s solicitation mode, the type of target population, the number of contact attempts, and the country in which the survey was conducted moderated the magnitude of the response rate differences. These findings have substantial implications for web survey methodology and operations.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/4188
http://dx.doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.4741
Citation: Daikeler, J. (2021). Response Rates Differences Web vs. Other. PsychOpen CAMA. https://doi.org/10.23668/PSYCHARCHIVES.4741
Appears in Collections:Research Data

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
CAMA_Daik.csv41,31 kBCSVDownload
Codebook_Daikeler.pdf134,53 kBAdobe PDF Preview PDF Download


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons