1. Home
  2. Browse
  3. The importance of unfair intention…
Preregistration

The importance of unfair intentions and outcome inequality for punishment by third parties and victims

What drives punishment in third parties and victims?

Author(s) / Creator(s)

Hechler, Stefanie
Kessler, Thomas

Abstract / Description

Whereas third parties and victims punish unfair intentions, victims may also punish the resulting negative outcome inequality between them and the offender. In the proposed study, we orthogonally cross the factors offender’s intention with the actual outcome. The participants are either in the role of a third party or of the victim and decide on the punishment of the offender. This approach captures qualitative differences of third-party punishment and punishment by victims.
This is a preregistration of the article: Hechler, S., & Kessler, T. (2022). The importance of unfair intentions and outcome inequality for punishment by third parties and victims.Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 230(2), 114–126. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000458

Keyword(s)

Retributivism Costly Punishment Dictator Game Punishment Motives Third-party Punishment

Persistent Identifier

PsychArchives acquisition timestamp

2020-10-26 15:28:56 UTC

Citation

Hechler, S., & Kessler, T. (2020). The importance of unfair intentions and outcome inequality for punishment by third parties and victims. Leibniz Institut für Psychologische Information und Dokumentation (ZPID). https://doi.org/10.23668/PSYCHARCHIVES.4273
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Hechler, Stefanie
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Kessler, Thomas
  • PsychArchives acquisition timestamp
    2020-10-26T15:28:56Z
  • Made available on
    2020-10-26T15:28:56Z
  • Date of first publication
    2020-10
  • Abstract / Description
    Whereas third parties and victims punish unfair intentions, victims may also punish the resulting negative outcome inequality between them and the offender. In the proposed study, we orthogonally cross the factors offender’s intention with the actual outcome. The participants are either in the role of a third party or of the victim and decide on the punishment of the offender. This approach captures qualitative differences of third-party punishment and punishment by victims.
    en_US
  • Abstract / Description
    This is a preregistration of the article: Hechler, S., & Kessler, T. (2022). The importance of unfair intentions and outcome inequality for punishment by third parties and victims.Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 230(2), 114–126. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000458
    en
  • Publication status
    other
  • Citation
    Hechler, S., & Kessler, T. (2020). The importance of unfair intentions and outcome inequality for punishment by third parties and victims. Leibniz Institut für Psychologische Information und Dokumentation (ZPID). https://doi.org/10.23668/PSYCHARCHIVES.4273
    en
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/3884
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.4273
  • Language of content
    eng
    en_US
  • Is related to
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.4693
  • Is related to
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.4694
  • Is related to
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.5055
  • Is related to
    https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000458
  • Keyword(s)
    Retributivism
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    Costly Punishment
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    Dictator Game
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    Punishment Motives
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    Third-party Punishment
    en_US
  • Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)
    150
  • Title
    The importance of unfair intentions and outcome inequality for punishment by third parties and victims
    en_US
  • Alternative title
    What drives punishment in third parties and victims?
    en_US
  • DRO type
    preregistration
    en_US
  • Leibniz subject classification
    Psychologie
  • Visible tag(s)
    PsychLab
    en