Research Data

Dataset for: Is Automation of Statistical Reasoning a Suitable Mindware In a Base-Rate Neglect Task

Author(s) / Creator(s)

Rapan, Klara
Valerjev, Pavle

Abstract / Description

Until recently, studies within the dual-process approach were mainly focused on group differences in processing, and individual differences were neglected. However, individual differences have proven to be a significant factor in conflict detection efficiency and overall success in base-rate neglect and similar tasks, which should be taken into consideration within the framework of the Hybrid Model of Dual Processing. New tendencies in the development of this model have focused attention on the degree of mindware instantiation as a predictor of base-rate neglect task efficiency. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between mindware and base-rate neglect task efficiency, and to test the difference of base-rate response frequency and conflict detection efficiency depending on the degree of mindware instantiation. All participants solved base-rate neglect tasks, made judgments of confidence in their responses and solved the Statistical Reasoning Test, Cognitive Reflection Test and Numeracy Scale. We used the Statistical Reasoning Test as a measure of mindware instantiation. The degree of mindware instantiation was found to be the only significant predictor of base-rate neglect task efficiency and it was shown that participants with a higher degree of mindware instantiation generally made more base-rate responses. No differences were found in conflict detection efficiency, depending on the degree of mindware instantiation. These findings support the hypothesis that the power of logical intuition depends on the individual's degree of mindware instantiation. Therefore, the results of this research indicate the importance of further research into the role of statistical reasoning in base-rate neglect task efficiency.
Dataset for: Rapan, K. & Valerjev, P. (2021). Is Automation of Statistical Reasoning a Suitable Mindware in a Base-Rate Neglect Task? Psihologijske teme, 30(3), 447–466. https://doi.org/10.31820/pt.30.3.3

Keyword(s)

mindware statistical reasoning base-rate neglect conflict detection Hybrid Model of Dual Processing

Persistent Identifier

Date of first publication

2020-09-14

Publisher

PsychArchives

Is referenced by

Citation

Rapan, K., & Valerjev, P. (2020). Dataset for: Is Automation of Statistical Reasoning a Suitable Mindware In a Base-Rate Neglect Task [Data set]. PsychArchives. https://doi.org/10.23668/PSYCHARCHIVES.3467
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Rapan, Klara
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Valerjev, Pavle
  • PsychArchives acquisition timestamp
    2020-09-14T15:01:41Z
  • Made available on
    2020-09-14T15:01:41Z
  • Date of first publication
    2020-09-14
  • Abstract / Description
    Until recently, studies within the dual-process approach were mainly focused on group differences in processing, and individual differences were neglected. However, individual differences have proven to be a significant factor in conflict detection efficiency and overall success in base-rate neglect and similar tasks, which should be taken into consideration within the framework of the Hybrid Model of Dual Processing. New tendencies in the development of this model have focused attention on the degree of mindware instantiation as a predictor of base-rate neglect task efficiency. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between mindware and base-rate neglect task efficiency, and to test the difference of base-rate response frequency and conflict detection efficiency depending on the degree of mindware instantiation. All participants solved base-rate neglect tasks, made judgments of confidence in their responses and solved the Statistical Reasoning Test, Cognitive Reflection Test and Numeracy Scale. We used the Statistical Reasoning Test as a measure of mindware instantiation. The degree of mindware instantiation was found to be the only significant predictor of base-rate neglect task efficiency and it was shown that participants with a higher degree of mindware instantiation generally made more base-rate responses. No differences were found in conflict detection efficiency, depending on the degree of mindware instantiation. These findings support the hypothesis that the power of logical intuition depends on the individual's degree of mindware instantiation. Therefore, the results of this research indicate the importance of further research into the role of statistical reasoning in base-rate neglect task efficiency.
    en
  • Abstract / Description
    Dataset for: Rapan, K. & Valerjev, P. (2021). Is Automation of Statistical Reasoning a Suitable Mindware in a Base-Rate Neglect Task? Psihologijske teme, 30(3), 447–466. https://doi.org/10.31820/pt.30.3.3
    en
  • Review status
    unknown
    en
  • Citation
    Rapan, K., & Valerjev, P. (2020). Dataset for: Is Automation of Statistical Reasoning a Suitable Mindware In a Base-Rate Neglect Task [Data set]. PsychArchives. https://doi.org/10.23668/PSYCHARCHIVES.3467
    en
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/3082
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.3467
  • Language of content
    eng
  • Publisher
    PsychArchives
    en
  • Is referenced by
    https://doi.org/10.31820/pt.30.3.3
  • Is related to
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.3468
  • Is related to
    https://doi.org/10.31820/pt.30.3.3
  • Keyword(s)
    mindware
    en
  • Keyword(s)
    statistical reasoning
    en
  • Keyword(s)
    base-rate neglect
    en
  • Keyword(s)
    conflict detection
    en
  • Keyword(s)
    Hybrid Model of Dual Processing
    en
  • Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)
    150
  • Title
    Dataset for: Is Automation of Statistical Reasoning a Suitable Mindware In a Base-Rate Neglect Task
    en
  • DRO type
    researchData
    en