Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.3160
Title: A painful message: Testing the roles of suffering and understanding in punishment judgments in second- and third-party contexts
Authors: Aharoni, Eyal
Simpson, David
Nahmias, Eddy
Gollwitzer, Mario
Issue Date: Aug-2020
Abstract: This experiment will use a contrastive vignette method to examine predictors of punishment attitudes in a U.S. sample. The understanding hypothesis predicts that the signal that the perpetrator understands why he has been punished will increase satisfaction with the punishment and reduce additional punishment recommendations, relative to the no understanding condition. The suffering hypothesis predicts that the induction of suffering alone will be sufficient to evoke satisfaction with the punishment and reduce additional punishment recommendations. We expect that indicators of punishment goal fulfillment will be greatest in the combined presence of suffering and understanding.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/2776
http://dx.doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.3160
Citation: Aharoni, E., Simpsons, D., Nahmias, E., Gollwitzer, M. (2020). A painful message: Testing the roles of suffering and understanding in punishment judgments in second- and third-party contexts. Leibniz Institut für Psychologische Information und Dokumentation (ZPID). https://doi.org/10.23668/PSYCHARCHIVES.3160
Appears in Collections:Preregistration

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Aharoni_et_al_ZfP PreReg.pdf354,68 kBAdobe PDF Preview PDF Download


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons