This is not the latest version of this Digital Research Object (DRO). The latest version can be found here!
Dataset: Top-down and bottom-up influences on dynamic visual attention: Attentional Capture in Multiple Object Tracking
Author(s) / Creator(s)
Pichlmeier, Sebastian
Pfeiffer, Till
Abstract / Description
Multiple Object Tracking (MOT) is assumed to be handled by bottom-up (e.g. Pylyshsyn & Storm, 1988) or top-down processes of selection (e.g. Yantis, 1992) or both (e.g. Oksama & Hyönä, 2008) – depending on the model assumed. The Attentional Capture (AC) paradigm (e.g. Yantis & Jonides, 1984) is regularly employed to demonstrate influences of bottom-up and/or top-down attentional control. It has up to now not been used to assess influences of irrelevant stimuli in MOT. We investigated whether AC does occur in MOT: Are irrelevant stimuli processed at all in dynamic attentional tasks? We found that sudden onset singletons were effective in lowering probe detection thus demonstrating AC. Tracking performance as dependent measure was not affected. The AC effect persisted in conditions of higher tracking load (experiment 2) and was dramatically increased in lower presentation frequency (experiment 3). Tracking performance was shown to suffer only when irrelevant distractors were presented serially with very short time gaps in between thus effectively disturbing reengaging attention on the tracking set (experiment 4). We discuss that a stable representation of the tracking array in visual working memory and rapid dis- and reengagement of attention allow managing strong disruptions of tracking.
Persistent Identifier
Date of first publication
2021-01-18
Publisher
PsychArchives
Citation
Pichlmeier, S., & Pfeiffer, T. (2021). Dataset: Top-down and bottom-up influences on dynamic visual attention: Attentional Capture in Multiple Object Tracking. PsychArchives. http://dx.doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.4481
-
exp1.csvCSV - 63.71KBMD5: c5ef3dcf7d89da0ec12da919353bf263Description: DataExp1
-
exp2.csvCSV - 851.83KBMD5: a3363cd78091e5152fd9944b42783bf5Description: DataExp2
-
exp3.csvCSV - 130.59KBMD5: 52367ff158ea26dbf1711c58f3014320Description: DataExp3
-
exp4.csvCSV - 526.74KBMD5: 27eda0e670d46364060941e790dbd8bdDescription: DataExp4
-
Abstract_Top-down and bottom-up influences on dynamic visual attention Attentional Capture in Multiple Object Tracking.pdfAdobe PDF - 105.96KBMD5: 2e473a0469facc9d5a7232a8d0bdbfc1Description: Abstract
-
32021-06-08Updated as of June 8th, 2021: Due to a general revision of the related research report, title and abstract were modified. The data set itself is unchanged.
-
22021-01-18Updated as of January 18th, 2021; includes updated analysis of experiment 3 on basis of a broadened data base, new experiment 4, and updated abstract.
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Pichlmeier, Sebastian
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Pfeiffer, Till
-
PsychArchives acquisition timestamp2021-01-18T16:32:00Z
-
Made available on2020-06-15T15:25:22Z
-
Made available on2021-01-18T16:32:00Z
-
Date of first publication2021-01-18
-
Abstract / DescriptionMultiple Object Tracking (MOT) is assumed to be handled by bottom-up (e.g. Pylyshsyn & Storm, 1988) or top-down processes of selection (e.g. Yantis, 1992) or both (e.g. Oksama & Hyönä, 2008) – depending on the model assumed. The Attentional Capture (AC) paradigm (e.g. Yantis & Jonides, 1984) is regularly employed to demonstrate influences of bottom-up and/or top-down attentional control. It has up to now not been used to assess influences of irrelevant stimuli in MOT. We investigated whether AC does occur in MOT: Are irrelevant stimuli processed at all in dynamic attentional tasks? We found that sudden onset singletons were effective in lowering probe detection thus demonstrating AC. Tracking performance as dependent measure was not affected. The AC effect persisted in conditions of higher tracking load (experiment 2) and was dramatically increased in lower presentation frequency (experiment 3). Tracking performance was shown to suffer only when irrelevant distractors were presented serially with very short time gaps in between thus effectively disturbing reengaging attention on the tracking set (experiment 4). We discuss that a stable representation of the tracking array in visual working memory and rapid dis- and reengagement of attention allow managing strong disruptions of tracking.en
-
Review statusunknownen
-
CitationPichlmeier, S., & Pfeiffer, T. (2021). Dataset: Top-down and bottom-up influences on dynamic visual attention: Attentional Capture in Multiple Object Tracking. PsychArchives. http://dx.doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.4481en
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/2696.2
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.4481
-
Language of contenteng
-
PublisherPsychArchivesen
-
Is related tohttps://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.4482
-
Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)150
-
TitleDataset: Top-down and bottom-up influences on dynamic visual attention: Attentional Capture in Multiple Object Trackingen
-
DRO typeresearchDataen