Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.2509
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.rights.licenseCC-BY-SA 4.0en_US
dc.contributor.authorSchneider, Jürgen-
dc.contributor.authorMerk, Samuel-
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-26T07:50:32Z-
dc.date.available2019-06-26T07:50:32Z-
dc.date.issued2019-06-14-
dc.identifier.citationSchneider, J., & Merk, S. (2019, June 14). Re-Building Trust. PsychArchives. https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.2509en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/2133-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.2509-
dc.description.abstractThe Replication Crisis diminishes trust in empirical sciences and with it the perceived value of sciece (Lupia, 2018, 10.1007/978-3-319-54395-6_41). Open Science Practices (i.a. open data, open analysis script, open materials) are an increasingly popular approach to deal with challenges in replication and to rebuilt trust (Geukes et al, 2016, 10.1026/1612-5010/a000167). First investigations could, however, deliver no evidence toward the effect of Open Science Practices (OSP) on trustworthiness (Wingen, Berkessel & Englich, 2019, 10.31219/osf.io/4ukq5). The study investigated the effect on a discipline level (psychology) with an abstract description of OSP. Within the ongoing discussion about incentives for OSP (e.g. badges for OSP), we want to shift the focus from discipline level to concrete individual journal articles and consider epistemic beliefs of readers to play a role (Merk & Rosman, 2018, 10.31219/osf.io/cduqe): Will visible OSP (vs. not visible vs. visibly non-OSP) foster perceived trustworthiness when reading journal articles of empirical studies? Will multiplistic epistemic beliefs moderate the relationship between OSP and trustorthiness?en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherPsychArchivesen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://osf.io/2zypf-
dc.rightsopenAccessen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.subjectOpen Scienceen_US
dc.subjectbadgesen_US
dc.subjectintegrityen_US
dc.subjecttrusten_US
dc.subjectepistemic beliefsen_US
dc.subject.ddc150-
dc.titleRe-Building Trusten_US
dc.typestudyProtocolen_US
dc.description.pubstatusother-
Appears in Collections:Study Protocols

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
power_analyses.html1,28 MBHTMLDownload
Preregistration_Re-Building Trust.pdf119,07 kBAdobe PDF Preview PDF Download


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons