Notice This is not the latest version of this item. The latest version can be found at:
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.rights.licenseCC-BY-SA 4.0en_US
dc.contributor.authorSchneider, Jürgen-
dc.contributor.authorMerk, Samuel-
dc.identifier.citationSchneider, J., & Merk, S. (2019, June 14). Re-Building Trust. PsychArchives.
dc.description.abstractThe Replication Crisis diminishes trust in empirical sciences and with it the perceived value of science (Lupia, 2018, 10.1007/978-3-319-54395-6_41). Open Science Practices (i.a. open data, open analysis script, open materials) are an increasingly popular approach to deal with challenges in replication and to rebuilt trust (Geukes et al, 2016, 10.1026/1612-5010/a000167). First investigations could, however, deliver no evidence toward the effect of Open Science Practices (OSP) on trustworthiness (Wingen, Berkessel & Englich, 2019, 10.31219/ The study investigated the effect on a discipline level (psychology) with an abstract description of OSP. Within the ongoing discussion about incentives for OSP (e.g. badges for OSP), we want to shift the focus from discipline level to concrete individual journal articles and consider epistemic beliefs of readers to play a role (Merk & Rosman, 2018, 10.31219/ Will visible OSP (vs. not visible vs. visibly non-OSP) foster perceived trustworthiness when reading journal articles of empirical studies? Will multiplistic epistemic beliefs moderate the relationship between OSP and trustworthiness?en_US
dc.subjectOpen Scienceen_US
dc.subjectepistemic beliefsen_US
dc.titleRe-Building Trusten_US
Appears in Collections:Study Protocols

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
power_analyses.html1,28 MBHTMLDownload
Preregistration_Re-Building Trust.pdf119,07 kBAdobe PDF Preview PDF Download

Version History
Version Item Date Summary
2 10.23668/psycharchives.2749 2020-02-04 12:40:06.1 After the first preregistration we became aware of the capability of the framework used in the bain package - especially the opportunity to use multiply imputed data (Hoijtink, Gu, Mulder, & Rosseel 2019). We therefore created another preregistration
1 10.23668/psycharchives.2509 2019-06-26 09:50:32.0

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons