The Regulatory Emotional Self-Efficacy Scale: Issues of Reliability and Validity Within a Turkish Sample Group
Author(s) / Creator(s)
Totan, Tarık
Abstract / Description
The purpose of this study was to psychometrically evaluate the Turkish version of the Regulatory Emotional Self-efficacy Scale (RESE). The RESE, the Emotional Self-efficacy Scale, the Self-liking/Self-competence Scale, and the Oxford Happiness Questionnaire were applied to 303 university students in total, 180 were women (59.4%) and 123 were men (40.6%). According to results of confirmatory factor analysis applied in the study are founded enough conformity between the priori hypothesis model and the data. In addition, the metric invariance model shows that there were no gender differences on this confirmatory model. Internal consistency coefficients were all above the acceptable for the RESE’s sub-scale and total. Moreover, positive correlations were found between regulatory emotional self-efficacy dimensions and emotional self-efficacy, self-esteem, and happiness. According to these research findings, the RESE is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring regulatory self-efficacy in Turkish.
Keyword(s)
Regulatory Emotional Self-efficacy Scale (RESE) emotional self-efficacy self-efficacy beliefs emotional regulation validity reliabilityPersistent Identifier
Date of first publication
2014-10-22
Journal title
Psychological Thought
Volume
7
Issue
2
Page numbers
144–155
Publisher
PsychOpen GOLD
Publication status
publishedVersion
Review status
peerReviewed
Is version of
Citation
Totan, T. (2014). The Regulatory Emotional Self-Efficacy Scale: Issues of Reliability and Validity Within a Turkish Sample Group. Psychological Thought, 7(2), 144–155. https://doi.org/10.5964/psyct.v7i2.99
-
psyct.v7i2.99.pdfAdobe PDF - 512.58KBMD5: 4a3dd20c318f620b53c991a653d73bc2
-
There are no other versions of this object.
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Totan, Tarık
-
PsychArchives acquisition timestamp2018-11-28T10:02:03Z
-
Made available on2018-11-28T10:02:03Z
-
Date of first publication2014-10-22
-
Abstract / DescriptionThe purpose of this study was to psychometrically evaluate the Turkish version of the Regulatory Emotional Self-efficacy Scale (RESE). The RESE, the Emotional Self-efficacy Scale, the Self-liking/Self-competence Scale, and the Oxford Happiness Questionnaire were applied to 303 university students in total, 180 were women (59.4%) and 123 were men (40.6%). According to results of confirmatory factor analysis applied in the study are founded enough conformity between the priori hypothesis model and the data. In addition, the metric invariance model shows that there were no gender differences on this confirmatory model. Internal consistency coefficients were all above the acceptable for the RESE’s sub-scale and total. Moreover, positive correlations were found between regulatory emotional self-efficacy dimensions and emotional self-efficacy, self-esteem, and happiness. According to these research findings, the RESE is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring regulatory self-efficacy in Turkish.en_US
-
Publication statuspublishedVersion
-
Review statuspeerReviewed
-
CitationTotan, T. (2014). The Regulatory Emotional Self-Efficacy Scale: Issues of Reliability and Validity Within a Turkish Sample Group. Psychological Thought, 7(2), 144–155. https://doi.org/10.5964/psyct.v7i2.99en_US
-
ISSN2193-7281
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/1592
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.1958
-
Language of contenteng
-
PublisherPsychOpen GOLD
-
Is version ofhttps://doi.org/10.5964/psyct.v7i2.99
-
Keyword(s)Regulatory Emotional Self-efficacy Scale (RESE)en_US
-
Keyword(s)emotional self-efficacyen_US
-
Keyword(s)self-efficacy beliefsen_US
-
Keyword(s)emotional regulationen_US
-
Keyword(s)validityen_US
-
Keyword(s)reliabilityen_US
-
Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)150
-
TitleThe Regulatory Emotional Self-Efficacy Scale: Issues of Reliability and Validity Within a Turkish Sample Groupen_US
-
DRO typearticle
-
Issue2
-
Journal titlePsychological Thought
-
Page numbers144–155
-
Volume7
-
Visible tag(s)Version of Record