Article Version of Record

Prejudice reduction and collective action: A conflict or confluence of interests?

Author(s) / Creator(s)

Mazur, Lucas B.

Abstract / Description

There is a growing body of research findings suggesting that prejudice reduction strategies can have unintended negative consequences, particularly by helping to stabilize systems of inequality. In light of these findings, a handful of scholars have suggested that the field be guided less by the prejudice reduction tradition, so as to focus more on collective action. While agreeing with the recent critiques of prejudice reduction, I argue that in more robustly embracing a collective action approach we should be careful not to abandon the notion of perceptualism that colored original thinking on prejudice reduction, lest we artificially narrow the scope of social psychological research and unintentionally ignore communities that do not fit well within current thinking in the collective action tradition.

Keyword(s)

social change prejudice ironic effects sedative effects collective action perceptualism

Persistent Identifier

Date of first publication

2015-12-11

Journal title

Journal of Social and Political Psychology

Volume

3

Issue

2

Page numbers

291–309

Publisher

PsychOpen GOLD

Publication status

publishedVersion

Review status

peerReviewed

Is version of

Citation

Mazur, L. B. (2015). Prejudice reduction and collective action: A conflict or confluence of interests? Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 3(2), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v3i2.324
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Mazur, Lucas B.
  • PsychArchives acquisition timestamp
    2018-11-26T12:44:32Z
  • Made available on
    2018-11-26T12:44:32Z
  • Date of first publication
    2015-12-11
  • Abstract / Description
    There is a growing body of research findings suggesting that prejudice reduction strategies can have unintended negative consequences, particularly by helping to stabilize systems of inequality. In light of these findings, a handful of scholars have suggested that the field be guided less by the prejudice reduction tradition, so as to focus more on collective action. While agreeing with the recent critiques of prejudice reduction, I argue that in more robustly embracing a collective action approach we should be careful not to abandon the notion of perceptualism that colored original thinking on prejudice reduction, lest we artificially narrow the scope of social psychological research and unintentionally ignore communities that do not fit well within current thinking in the collective action tradition.
    en_US
  • Publication status
    publishedVersion
  • Review status
    peerReviewed
  • Citation
    Mazur, L. B. (2015). Prejudice reduction and collective action: A conflict or confluence of interests? Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 3(2), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v3i2.324
    en_US
  • ISSN
    2195-3325
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/1376
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.1674
  • Language of content
    eng
  • Publisher
    PsychOpen GOLD
  • Is version of
    https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v3i2.324
  • Keyword(s)
    social change
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    prejudice
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    ironic effects
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    sedative effects
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    collective action
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    perceptualism
    en_US
  • Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)
    150
  • Title
    Prejudice reduction and collective action: A conflict or confluence of interests?
    en_US
  • DRO type
    article
  • Issue
    2
  • Journal title
    Journal of Social and Political Psychology
  • Page numbers
    291–309
  • Volume
    3
  • Visible tag(s)
    Version of Record