Neuroticism and State Differences in Partisanship in the USA: Emotional Stability, Ideological Orientation, and Republican Preference
Author(s) / Creator(s)
McCann, Stewart J. H.
Abstract / Description
Relations between Neuroticism, Republican-Democrat preference, and conservative-liberal ideological orientation were examined with the states of the USA as units of analysis. State-aggregated Neuroticism scores were based on 1999-2005 responses of 619,397 residents to the 44-item Big Five Inventory. State Republican-Democrat preference was based on the 2002 occupancy of the U.S. Presidency, U.S. House, U.S. Senate, state House, state Senate, and state Governorship, as well as state-aggregated partisanship responses of 110,305 persons to 1998-2002 CBS/New York Times national polls. State conservative-liberal ideological orientation was based on 1998-2002 state-aggregated responses of 103,828 persons to CBS/New York Times national polls. Using correlation, partial correlation, and hierarchical multiple regression, it was determined that lower state resident Neuroticism is associated with Republican preference, and that both conservative-liberal ideological orientation and state resident Neuroticism account independently for variance in Republican-Democrat preference. These relations were found when 1998-2002 state socioeconomic status, white percent, and urban percent were statistically considered and controlled in partial correlation and hierarchical regression analysis. In contrast, corresponding analyses involving the other Big Five showed that only Openness and Conscientiousness showed any relation to partisanship, albeit infrequent and inconsistent. State resident Neuroticism is the primary state-level Big Five predictor of Republican/Democratic Party choice.
Keyword(s)
Republican neuroticism political ideology partisanship electionsPersistent Identifier
Date of first publication
2014-09-30
Journal title
Journal of Social and Political Psychology
Volume
2
Issue
1
Page numbers
242–267
Publisher
PsychOpen GOLD
Publication status
publishedVersion
Review status
peerReviewed
Is version of
Citation
McCann, S. J. H. (2014). Neuroticism and State Differences in Partisanship in the USA: Emotional Stability, Ideological Orientation, and Republican Preference. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 2(1), 242–267. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v2i1.309
-
jspp.v2i1.309.pdfAdobe PDF - 566.7KBMD5: 96a3f4ae7dc6e7a6b47094f9e9b417bb
-
There are no other versions of this object.
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)McCann, Stewart J. H.
-
PsychArchives acquisition timestamp2018-11-26T12:45:06Z
-
Made available on2018-11-26T12:45:06Z
-
Date of first publication2014-09-30
-
Abstract / DescriptionRelations between Neuroticism, Republican-Democrat preference, and conservative-liberal ideological orientation were examined with the states of the USA as units of analysis. State-aggregated Neuroticism scores were based on 1999-2005 responses of 619,397 residents to the 44-item Big Five Inventory. State Republican-Democrat preference was based on the 2002 occupancy of the U.S. Presidency, U.S. House, U.S. Senate, state House, state Senate, and state Governorship, as well as state-aggregated partisanship responses of 110,305 persons to 1998-2002 CBS/New York Times national polls. State conservative-liberal ideological orientation was based on 1998-2002 state-aggregated responses of 103,828 persons to CBS/New York Times national polls. Using correlation, partial correlation, and hierarchical multiple regression, it was determined that lower state resident Neuroticism is associated with Republican preference, and that both conservative-liberal ideological orientation and state resident Neuroticism account independently for variance in Republican-Democrat preference. These relations were found when 1998-2002 state socioeconomic status, white percent, and urban percent were statistically considered and controlled in partial correlation and hierarchical regression analysis. In contrast, corresponding analyses involving the other Big Five showed that only Openness and Conscientiousness showed any relation to partisanship, albeit infrequent and inconsistent. State resident Neuroticism is the primary state-level Big Five predictor of Republican/Democratic Party choice.en_US
-
Publication statuspublishedVersion
-
Review statuspeerReviewed
-
CitationMcCann, S. J. H. (2014). Neuroticism and State Differences in Partisanship in the USA: Emotional Stability, Ideological Orientation, and Republican Preference. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 2(1), 242–267. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v2i1.309en_US
-
ISSN2195-3325
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/1345
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.1751
-
Language of contenteng
-
PublisherPsychOpen GOLD
-
Is version ofhttps://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v2i1.309
-
Keyword(s)Republicanen_US
-
Keyword(s)neuroticismen_US
-
Keyword(s)politicalen_US
-
Keyword(s)ideologyen_US
-
Keyword(s)partisanshipen_US
-
Keyword(s)electionsen_US
-
Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)150
-
TitleNeuroticism and State Differences in Partisanship in the USA: Emotional Stability, Ideological Orientation, and Republican Preferenceen_US
-
DRO typearticle
-
Issue1
-
Journal titleJournal of Social and Political Psychology
-
Page numbers242–267
-
Volume2
-
Visible tag(s)Version of Record