Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.1689
Title: Differential Effects of Right-Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation on Political Candidate Support: The Moderating Role of Message Framing
Authors: Crawford, Jarret T.
Brady, Jennifer L.
Pilanski, Jane M.
Erny, Heather
Issue Date: 4-Sep-2013
Publisher: PsychOpen
Abstract: Employing a dual process motivational (DPM) model perspective, we found that how political messages are framed influences the differential effects of right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) and social dominance orientation (SDO) on political candidate support in the United States. Study 1 (N = 85) found that RWA and SDO differentially predicted support for right-wing candidates who used cohesion and group status threats to frame same-sex marriage, respectively. Study 2 (N = 89) largely replicated those findings on immigration policy. In Study 3 (N = 128), the hypothesis that RWA and SDO negatively predicted support for left-wing candidates who framed same-sex marriage in terms of individual liberty and social equality, respectively, received partial support. Additional analyses indicated that the effects of RWA on candidate support in these studies were driven by specific theoretically-relevant dimensions of RWA. Together, these results indicate that candidates can enhance their appeal by strategically employing value-based political messages targeting different subsets of their constituency.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/1307
http://dx.doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.1689
Appears in Collections:Article

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
jspp.v1i1.170.pdf476,53 kBAdobe PDF Preview PDFDownload


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons