Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Middle school students' and mathematicians' judgments of mathematical typicality
Authors: Walkington, Candace
Cooper, Jennifer
Leonard, Olubukola
Williams-Pierce, Caroline
Kalish, Chuck
Issue Date: 7-Jun-2018
Publisher: PsychOpen
Abstract: K-12 students often rely on testing examples to explore and determine the truth of mathematical conjectures. However, little is known about how K-12 students choose examples and what elements are important when considering example choice. In other domains, experts give explicit consideration to the typicality of examples – how representative a given item is of a general class. In a pilot study, we interviewed 20 middle school students who classified examples as typical or unusual and justified their classification. We then gave middle school students and mathematicians a survey where they rated the typicality of mathematical objects in two contexts – an everyday context (commonness in everyday life) and a mathematical context (how likely conjectures that hold for the object are to hold for other objects). Mathematicians had distinct notions of everyday and mathematical typicality – they recognized that the objects often seen in everyday life can have mathematical properties that can limit inductive generalization. Middle school students largely did not differentiate between everyday and mathematical typicality – they did not view special mathematical properties as limiting generalization, and rated items similarly regardless of context. These results suggest directions for learning mathematical argumentation and represent an important step towards understanding the nature of typicality in math.
Appears in Collections:Article

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
jnc.v4i1.70.pdf973,65 kBAdobe PDF Preview PDFDownload

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons