Article Version of Record

Intensive math training does not affect approximate number acuity: Evidence from a three-year longitudinal curriculum intervention

Author(s) / Creator(s)

Sullivan, Jessica
Frank, Michael C.
Barner, David

Abstract / Description

Does nonverbal, approximate number acuity predict mathematics performance? Some studies report a correlation between acuity of representations in the Approximate Number System (ANS) and early math achievement, while others do not. Few previous reports have addressed (1) whether reported correlations remain when other domain-general capacities are considered, and (2) whether such correlations are causal. In the present study, we addressed both questions using a large (N = 204) 3-year longitudinal dataset from a successful math intervention, which included a wide array of non-numerical cognitive tasks. While we replicated past work finding correlations between approximate number acuity and math success, these correlations were very small when other domain-general capacities were considered. Also, we found no evidence that changes to math performance induced changes to approximate number acuity, militating against one class of causal accounts.

Keyword(s)

numerical cognition math mental abacus cognitive development

Persistent Identifier

Date of first publication

2016-08-05

Journal title

Journal of Numerical Cognition

Volume

2

Issue

2

Page numbers

57–76

Publisher

PsychOpen GOLD

Publication status

publishedVersion

Review status

peerReviewed

Is version of

Citation

Sullivan, J., Frank, M. C., & Barner, D. (2016). Intensive math training does not affect approximate number acuity: Evidence from a three-year longitudinal curriculum intervention. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 2(2), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.v2i2.19
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Sullivan, Jessica
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Frank, Michael C.
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Barner, David
  • PsychArchives acquisition timestamp
    2018-11-21T11:42:40Z
  • Made available on
    2018-11-21T11:42:40Z
  • Date of first publication
    2016-08-05
  • Abstract / Description
    Does nonverbal, approximate number acuity predict mathematics performance? Some studies report a correlation between acuity of representations in the Approximate Number System (ANS) and early math achievement, while others do not. Few previous reports have addressed (1) whether reported correlations remain when other domain-general capacities are considered, and (2) whether such correlations are causal. In the present study, we addressed both questions using a large (N = 204) 3-year longitudinal dataset from a successful math intervention, which included a wide array of non-numerical cognitive tasks. While we replicated past work finding correlations between approximate number acuity and math success, these correlations were very small when other domain-general capacities were considered. Also, we found no evidence that changes to math performance induced changes to approximate number acuity, militating against one class of causal accounts.
    en_US
  • Publication status
    publishedVersion
  • Review status
    peerReviewed
  • Citation
    Sullivan, J., Frank, M. C., & Barner, D. (2016). Intensive math training does not affect approximate number acuity: Evidence from a three-year longitudinal curriculum intervention. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 2(2), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.v2i2.19
    en_US
  • ISSN
    2363-8761
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/1237
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.1429
  • Language of content
    eng
  • Publisher
    PsychOpen GOLD
  • Is version of
    https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.v2i2.19
  • Keyword(s)
    numerical cognition
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    math
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    mental abacus
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    cognitive development
    en_US
  • Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)
    150
  • Title
    Intensive math training does not affect approximate number acuity: Evidence from a three-year longitudinal curriculum intervention
    en_US
  • DRO type
    article
  • Issue
    2
  • Journal title
    Journal of Numerical Cognition
  • Page numbers
    57–76
  • Volume
    2
  • Visible tag(s)
    Version of Record