Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.1353
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.rights.licenseCC-BY 3.0
dc.contributor.authorStrack, Micha
dc.contributor.authorDobewall, Henrik
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-21T10:00:48Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-21T10:00:48Z-
dc.date.issued2012-11-30
dc.identifier.issn1841-0413
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/1161-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.1353-
dc.description.abstractBased on the 21-item Human Values Scale of the European Social Survey (ESS, 2002–2006), Bilsky, Janik, and Schwartz (2011) concluded that the quasi-circular model of Schwartz’s value theory “fits somewhat less well in less developed societies” (p. 16). This article focuses on their mitigating quantifier “somewhat” and proposes an impartial measure to evaluate Schwartz’s universality claim. European Social Survey data of four rounds 2002–2008 (33 countries, 98 samples) were analysed. Applying restricted confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), we partitioned the 21 items’ variance into an acquiescence part and the two diagonal axes of growth-protection and social-personal focused values. The variance in the growth–protection axis varied between 22.0% (Austria, in 2002) and 2.0% (samples from Romania, Turkey, Ukraine, Hungary, and Slovakia remain below 5%). Within rounds across countries (respective df = 94), the growth–protection axis’ variance strongly correlates (r = .76) with an index of socioeconomic development, aggregated from five indicators adopted from the World Bank. It also strongly correlates (r = .81) with a sample’s mean member’s location on the growth vs. protection value dimension. We interpret these results as a strong effect and conclude that in socioeconomically less developed countries the value structure remains elliptical or even one-dimensional. The discussion relates the results to Klages’ value synthesis theory.en_US
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherPsychOpen
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v8i4.505
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
dc.subjectuniversality of the value structureen_US
dc.subjectEuropean Social Survey (ESS)en_US
dc.subjectRestricted Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA)en_US
dc.subject.ddc150
dc.titleThe Value Structure in Socioeconomically Less Developed European Countries Still Remains an Ellipseen_US
dc.typearticle
dc.description.reviewpeerReviewed
dc.description.pubstatuspublishedVersion
zpid.sourceinfo.journaltitleEurope’s Journal of Psychology
zpid.sourceinfo.volume8
zpid.sourceinfo.issue4
zpid.sourceinfo.pages587–602
Appears in Collections:Article

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
ejop.v8i4.505.pdf2,74 MBAdobe PDF Preview PDF Download


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons