Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.1315
Title: Reconsidering the differences between shame and guilt
Authors: Miceli, Maria
Castelfranchi, Cristiano
Issue Date: 31-Aug-2018
Publisher: PsychOpen
Abstract: Although most researchers maintain that shame and guilt are distinct emotions, the debate on their differences is still open. We aim to show that some of the current distinctions between shame and guilt need to be redrawn, and their adaptive and social implications need to be revisited. We suggest the following distinguishing criteria: the kind of self-evaluation involved (inadequacy versus harmfulness); one’s focus on the perceived discrepancy between actual and ideal self versus one’s focus on the perceived responsibility for one’s fault; and consequently the different domains of self-esteem involved. Although these criteria have been in part suggested or alluded to in the relevant literature, we use and integrate them with each other in a novel way. This allows to better distinguish between shame and guilt, as well as to account for their possible coexistence or the shift from one emotion to the other.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/1123
http://dx.doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.1315
Appears in Collections:Article

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
ejop.v14i3.1564.pdf278,08 kBAdobe PDF Preview PDFDownload


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons