Code

R code for Study 4: Fraas, W. (2024). Passion in the context of work: measurement and fostering.

Fraas, W. (2024). Passion in the context of work: measurement and fostering. Study 4: Train your work passion.

Author(s) / Creator(s)

Fraas, Wieland

Abstract / Description

Work passion is considered desirable as it's harmonious (HWP) facet is related to adaptive work outcomes while it's obsessive (OWP) facet is primarily related to less desirable work outcomes yet may also yield some benefits. The dualistic model of passion (Vallerand et al., 2003, 2019) suggests a major role of basic need satisfaction at work for work passion development, while basic need satisfaction off-work may play a role for OWP (Lalande et al., 2015). Yet how exactly HWP and OWP can be fostered or transformed into each other remains largely unknown. Therefore, this training study investigated if HWP can be fostered via an individual online-training targeting autonomy, competence, relatedness at work. Furhtermore, autonomy, competence, relatedness at leisure were measured alongside. The three wave experimental design study including 3 measurement occasions across 8 weeks in April to June in 2021 was completed by a sample of German working students (N=67). The training was designed as a real online experiment, containing separate branches for each of the three basic needs (with 5 exercises each) as well as a control group. Longitudinal multilevel-modelling revealed no effects of training on either autonomy, competency or relatedness at work, nor on HWP or OWP. Relationships among observed variables however, were mostly in line with theory. While the training was unsuccessful in fostering HWP/ OWP, this study gained relevant insights on how to approach the fostering HWP/ OWP in the workplace, points out where limits to this endeavour might be, and proposes a different perspective to be taken on the topic. Limitations are discussed and specific recommendations for future HWP/ OPW training studies are given. The attached R syntax is ready to run with the attached data files. The syntax for the regression analysis from the publication are not included because R Markdown and R papaja were quite moody. The according files are available upon request from the author.

Keyword(s)

dualistic model of passion work passion passion BNS basic need satisfaction autonomy competency relatedness RStudio R online study multilevel longitudinal intervention training experiment control group

Persistent Identifier

Date of first publication

2024-07-22

Publisher

PsychArchives

Citation

  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Fraas, Wieland
  • PsychArchives acquisition timestamp
    2024-07-22T17:15:05Z
  • Made available on
    2024-07-22T17:15:05Z
  • Date of first publication
    2024-07-22
  • Abstract / Description
    Work passion is considered desirable as it's harmonious (HWP) facet is related to adaptive work outcomes while it's obsessive (OWP) facet is primarily related to less desirable work outcomes yet may also yield some benefits. The dualistic model of passion (Vallerand et al., 2003, 2019) suggests a major role of basic need satisfaction at work for work passion development, while basic need satisfaction off-work may play a role for OWP (Lalande et al., 2015). Yet how exactly HWP and OWP can be fostered or transformed into each other remains largely unknown. Therefore, this training study investigated if HWP can be fostered via an individual online-training targeting autonomy, competence, relatedness at work. Furhtermore, autonomy, competence, relatedness at leisure were measured alongside. The three wave experimental design study including 3 measurement occasions across 8 weeks in April to June in 2021 was completed by a sample of German working students (N=67). The training was designed as a real online experiment, containing separate branches for each of the three basic needs (with 5 exercises each) as well as a control group. Longitudinal multilevel-modelling revealed no effects of training on either autonomy, competency or relatedness at work, nor on HWP or OWP. Relationships among observed variables however, were mostly in line with theory. While the training was unsuccessful in fostering HWP/ OWP, this study gained relevant insights on how to approach the fostering HWP/ OWP in the workplace, points out where limits to this endeavour might be, and proposes a different perspective to be taken on the topic. Limitations are discussed and specific recommendations for future HWP/ OPW training studies are given. The attached R syntax is ready to run with the attached data files. The syntax for the regression analysis from the publication are not included because R Markdown and R papaja were quite moody. The according files are available upon request from the author.
    en
  • Publication status
    unknown
  • Review status
    unknown
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/10623
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.15187
  • Language of content
    eng
  • Publisher
    PsychArchives
  • Is related to
    https://aspredicted.org/blind.php?x=b32ev6
  • Is related to
    https://www.psycharchives.org/handle/20.500.12034/10619
  • Is related to
    https://www.psycharchives.org/handle/20.500.12034/10618
  • Is related to
    https://www.psycharchives.org/handle/20.500.12034/10624
  • Is related to
    https://www.psycharchives.org/handle/20.500.12034/10625
  • Is related to
    https://www.psycharchives.org/handle/20.500.12034/10622
  • Is related to
    https://www.psycharchives.org/handle/20.500.12034/10621
  • Is related to
    https://www.psycharchives.org/handle/20.500.12034/10620
  • Keyword(s)
    dualistic model of passion
  • Keyword(s)
    work passion
  • Keyword(s)
    passion
  • Keyword(s)
    BNS
  • Keyword(s)
    basic need satisfaction
  • Keyword(s)
    autonomy
  • Keyword(s)
    competency
  • Keyword(s)
    relatedness
  • Keyword(s)
    RStudio
  • Keyword(s)
    R
  • Keyword(s)
    online study
  • Keyword(s)
    multilevel
  • Keyword(s)
    longitudinal
  • Keyword(s)
    intervention
  • Keyword(s)
    training
  • Keyword(s)
    experiment
  • Keyword(s)
    control group
  • Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)
    150
  • Title
    R code for Study 4: Fraas, W. (2024). Passion in the context of work: measurement and fostering.
    en
  • Alternative title
    Fraas, W. (2024). Passion in the context of work: measurement and fostering. Study 4: Train your work passion.
    en
  • DRO type
    code
  • Leibniz subject classification
    Psychologie
  • Visible tag(s)
    dualistic model of passion
  • Visible tag(s)
    work passion
  • Visible tag(s)
    passion
  • Visible tag(s)
    BNS
  • Visible tag(s)
    basic need satisfaction
  • Visible tag(s)
    autonomy
  • Visible tag(s)
    competency
  • Visible tag(s)
    relatedness
  • Visible tag(s)
    RStudio
  • Visible tag(s)
    R
  • Visible tag(s)
    online study
  • Visible tag(s)
    multilevel
  • Visible tag(s)
    longitudinal
  • Visible tag(s)
    intervention
  • Visible tag(s)
    training
  • Visible tag(s)
    experiment
  • Visible tag(s)
    control group