Is rumination a risk and a protective factor?
Author(s) / Creator(s)
Harding, Kaitlin A.
Mezulis, Amy
Abstract / Description
High trait positive affect (PA) protects against depressive symptoms through cognitive responses such as rumination. However, how rumination in response to positive emotions (positive rumination) protects against depressive symptoms while rumination in response to negative emotions (brooding) predicts depressive symptoms is poorly understood. We hypothesized that (a) positive rumination and brooding represent a shared cognitive process of affect amplification on distinct affective content and (b) less brooding and greater positive rumination would distinctly mediate greater trait PA in predicting fewer depressive symptoms. Our prospective design among 321 adults first compared three confirmatory factor analysis models of the relationship between brooding and positive rumination. We then utilized structural equation modeling to examine whether brooding and positive rumination mediated the relationship between trait PA and depressive symptoms, controlling for baseline depressive symptoms, trait negative affect (NA), and the distinct effects of each mediator. Results supported a conceptualization of brooding and positive rumination as distinct but related constructs, represented as a common process of affect amplification to explain how rumination may amplify resilience or risk in predicting depressive symptoms (χ = 195.07, Δχ = 8.78, p < .001, CFI = .91, RMSEA = .07). Furthermore, positive rumination and brooding were distinctly predicted by trait PA, suggesting that trait PA exerts distinct effects on protective and risk forms of rumination. Less brooding mediated the relationship between greater trait PA and fewer depressive symptoms (β = -.04, p = .012), but positive rumination did not (β = .02, p = .517). Rumination may represent a protective and a risk factor, which may better enable individuals who brood to redirect their rumination on positive content and thereby reduce their risk of depressive symptoms.
Keyword(s)
affect broaden-and-build depression resiliency ruminationPersistent Identifier
Date of first publication
2017-03-03
Journal title
Europe's Journal of Psychology
Volume
13
Issue
1
Page numbers
28–46
Publisher
PsychOpen GOLD
Publication status
publishedVersion
Review status
peerReviewed
Is version of
Citation
Harding, K. A., & Mezulis, A. (2017). Is rumination a risk and a protective factor? Europe's Journal of Psychology, 13(1), 28–46. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v13i1.1279
-
ejop.v13i1.1279.pdfAdobe PDF - 478.71KBMD5: 3cae86047aab15ca4eba269e6e38dc0f
-
There are no other versions of this object.
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Harding, Kaitlin A.
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Mezulis, Amy
-
PsychArchives acquisition timestamp2018-11-21T09:59:56Z
-
Made available on2018-11-21T09:59:56Z
-
Date of first publication2017-03-03
-
Abstract / DescriptionHigh trait positive affect (PA) protects against depressive symptoms through cognitive responses such as rumination. However, how rumination in response to positive emotions (positive rumination) protects against depressive symptoms while rumination in response to negative emotions (brooding) predicts depressive symptoms is poorly understood. We hypothesized that (a) positive rumination and brooding represent a shared cognitive process of affect amplification on distinct affective content and (b) less brooding and greater positive rumination would distinctly mediate greater trait PA in predicting fewer depressive symptoms. Our prospective design among 321 adults first compared three confirmatory factor analysis models of the relationship between brooding and positive rumination. We then utilized structural equation modeling to examine whether brooding and positive rumination mediated the relationship between trait PA and depressive symptoms, controlling for baseline depressive symptoms, trait negative affect (NA), and the distinct effects of each mediator. Results supported a conceptualization of brooding and positive rumination as distinct but related constructs, represented as a common process of affect amplification to explain how rumination may amplify resilience or risk in predicting depressive symptoms (χ = 195.07, Δχ = 8.78, p < .001, CFI = .91, RMSEA = .07). Furthermore, positive rumination and brooding were distinctly predicted by trait PA, suggesting that trait PA exerts distinct effects on protective and risk forms of rumination. Less brooding mediated the relationship between greater trait PA and fewer depressive symptoms (β = -.04, p = .012), but positive rumination did not (β = .02, p = .517). Rumination may represent a protective and a risk factor, which may better enable individuals who brood to redirect their rumination on positive content and thereby reduce their risk of depressive symptoms.en_US
-
Publication statuspublishedVersion
-
Review statuspeerReviewed
-
CitationHarding, K. A., & Mezulis, A. (2017). Is rumination a risk and a protective factor? Europe's Journal of Psychology, 13(1), 28–46. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v13i1.1279
-
ISSN1841-0413
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/1041
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.1233
-
Language of contenteng
-
PublisherPsychOpen GOLD
-
Is version ofhttps://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v13i1.1279
-
Keyword(s)affecten_US
-
Keyword(s)broaden-and-builden_US
-
Keyword(s)depressionen_US
-
Keyword(s)resiliencyen_US
-
Keyword(s)ruminationen_US
-
Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)150
-
TitleIs rumination a risk and a protective factor?en_US
-
DRO typearticle
-
Issue1
-
Journal titleEurope's Journal of Psychology
-
Page numbers28–46
-
Volume13
-
Visible tag(s)Version of Record