Article Version of Record

Approximate number system discrimination training for 7-8 year olds improves approximate, but not exact, arithmetics, and only in children with low pre-training arithmetic scores

Author(s) / Creator(s)

Ferres-Forga, Nuria
Halberda, Justin

Abstract / Description

We investigated whether training the Approximate Number System (ANS) would transfer to improved arithmetic performance in 7-8 year olds compared to a control group. All children participated in Pre- and Post-Training assessments of exact symbolic arithmetic (additions and subtractions) and approximate symbolic arithmetic abilities (a novel test). During 3 weeks of training (approximately 25 minutes per day, two days per week), we found that children in the ANS Training group had stable individual differences in ANS efficiency and increased in ANS efficiency, both within and across the training days. We also found that individual differences in ANS efficiency were related to symbolic arithmetic performance. Regarding arithmetic performance, both the ANS training group and the control group improved in all tests (exact and approximate arithmetics tests). Thus, the ANS training did not show a specific effect on arithmetic performance. However, considering the initial arithmetic level of children, we found that the trained children showed a higher improvement on the novel approximate arithmetic test compared to the control group, but only for those children with a low pre-training arithmetic score. Nevertheless, this difference within the low pre-training arithmetic score level was not observed in the exact arithmetic test. The limited benefits observed in these results suggest that this type of ANS discrimination training, through quantity comparison tasks, may not have an impact on symbolic arithmetics overall, although we cautiously propose that it could help with approximate arithmetic abilities for children at this age with below-average arithmetic performance.

Keyword(s)

approximate number system early mathematics learning math in children math ability mathematics education number sense school mathematics

Persistent Identifier

Date of first publication

2020-12-03

Journal title

Journal of Numerical Cognition

Volume

6

Issue

3

Page numbers

275–303

Publisher

PsychOpen GOLD

Publication status

publishedVersion

Review status

peerReviewed

Is version of

Citation

Ferres-Forga, N., & Halberda, J. (2020). Approximate number system discrimination training for 7-8 year olds improves approximate, but not exact, arithmetics, and only in children with low pre-training arithmetic scores. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 6(3), 275-303. https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.v6i3.277
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Ferres-Forga, Nuria
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Halberda, Justin
  • PsychArchives acquisition timestamp
    2022-04-14T11:21:51Z
  • Made available on
    2022-04-14T11:21:51Z
  • Date of first publication
    2020-12-03
  • Abstract / Description
    We investigated whether training the Approximate Number System (ANS) would transfer to improved arithmetic performance in 7-8 year olds compared to a control group. All children participated in Pre- and Post-Training assessments of exact symbolic arithmetic (additions and subtractions) and approximate symbolic arithmetic abilities (a novel test). During 3 weeks of training (approximately 25 minutes per day, two days per week), we found that children in the ANS Training group had stable individual differences in ANS efficiency and increased in ANS efficiency, both within and across the training days. We also found that individual differences in ANS efficiency were related to symbolic arithmetic performance. Regarding arithmetic performance, both the ANS training group and the control group improved in all tests (exact and approximate arithmetics tests). Thus, the ANS training did not show a specific effect on arithmetic performance. However, considering the initial arithmetic level of children, we found that the trained children showed a higher improvement on the novel approximate arithmetic test compared to the control group, but only for those children with a low pre-training arithmetic score. Nevertheless, this difference within the low pre-training arithmetic score level was not observed in the exact arithmetic test. The limited benefits observed in these results suggest that this type of ANS discrimination training, through quantity comparison tasks, may not have an impact on symbolic arithmetics overall, although we cautiously propose that it could help with approximate arithmetic abilities for children at this age with below-average arithmetic performance.
    en_US
  • Publication status
    publishedVersion
  • Review status
    peerReviewed
  • Citation
    Ferres-Forga, N., & Halberda, J. (2020). Approximate number system discrimination training for 7-8 year olds improves approximate, but not exact, arithmetics, and only in children with low pre-training arithmetic scores. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 6(3), 275-303. https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.v6i3.277
    en_US
  • ISSN
    2363-8761
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/5483
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.6087
  • Language of content
    eng
  • Publisher
    PsychOpen GOLD
  • Is version of
    https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.v6i3.277
  • Is related to
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.4351
  • Keyword(s)
    approximate number system
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    early mathematics
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    learning math in children
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    math ability
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    mathematics education
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    number sense
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    school mathematics
    en_US
  • Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)
    150
  • Title
    Approximate number system discrimination training for 7-8 year olds improves approximate, but not exact, arithmetics, and only in children with low pre-training arithmetic scores
    en_US
  • DRO type
    article
  • Issue
    3
  • Journal title
    Journal of Numerical Cognition
  • Page numbers
    275–303
  • Volume
    6
  • Visible tag(s)
    Version of Record
    en_US