Research Data

Dataset for: Do managers accept artificial intelligence? Insights into the role of business area and AI functionality

Author(s) / Creator(s)

Gieselmann, Miriam
Erdsiek, Daniel
Rost, Vincent
Sassenberg, Kai

Abstract / Description

More and more companies use artificial intelligence (AI). Research aimed to understand acceptance from the perspective of AI users or people affected by AI decisions. However, the perspective of decision-makers in companies (i.e., managers) has not been considered. To address this gap, we investigate managers’ acceptance of AI usage in companies, focusing on two potential determinants. Across four experimental studies (Ntotal = 2025), we tested whether the business area (i.e., human resources vs. finances/ marketing) and AI functionality affect managers’ acceptance of AI (i.e., perceived risk of negative consequences, willingness to invest). Findings indicate that managers (a) perceive more risk of and (b) are less willing to invest in AI usage in human resources than in finances and marketing. Besides, the results suggest that acceptance declines if functionality crosses a critical boundary and AI autonomously implements decisions without prior human control. Accordingly, the current research sheds light on the AI acceptance of managers and gives insights into the role of the business area and AI functionality.

Persistent Identifier

Date of first publication

2025-02-20

Publisher

PsychArchives

Citation

  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Gieselmann, Miriam
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Erdsiek, Daniel
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Rost, Vincent
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Sassenberg, Kai
  • PsychArchives acquisition timestamp
    2025-02-20T17:27:22Z
  • Made available on
    2025-02-20T17:27:22Z
  • Date of first publication
    2025-02-20
  • Abstract / Description
    More and more companies use artificial intelligence (AI). Research aimed to understand acceptance from the perspective of AI users or people affected by AI decisions. However, the perspective of decision-makers in companies (i.e., managers) has not been considered. To address this gap, we investigate managers’ acceptance of AI usage in companies, focusing on two potential determinants. Across four experimental studies (Ntotal = 2025), we tested whether the business area (i.e., human resources vs. finances/ marketing) and AI functionality affect managers’ acceptance of AI (i.e., perceived risk of negative consequences, willingness to invest). Findings indicate that managers (a) perceive more risk of and (b) are less willing to invest in AI usage in human resources than in finances and marketing. Besides, the results suggest that acceptance declines if functionality crosses a critical boundary and AI autonomously implements decisions without prior human control. Accordingly, the current research sheds light on the AI acceptance of managers and gives insights into the role of the business area and AI functionality.
    en
  • Review status
    unknown
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/11552
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.16138
  • Language of content
    eng
  • Publisher
    PsychArchives
  • Is related to
    https://www.psycharchives.org/handle/20.500.12034/11553
  • Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)
    150
  • Title
    Dataset for: Do managers accept artificial intelligence? Insights into the role of business area and AI functionality
    en
  • DRO type
    researchData
  • Leibniz institute name(s) / abbreviation(s)
    ZPID