Article Accepted Manuscript

Nuances of information criteria for Bayesian psychometric models [Author Accepted Manuscript]

Author(s) / Creator(s)

Merkle, Edgar C.

Abstract / Description

It is common practice to compare Bayesian psychometric models via information criteria such as DIC and WAIC. Especially because these criteria can be automatically computed by MCMC software, it is easy to ignore the intricacies related to their computation. This often leads researchers to use noisy criteria that may lead to suboptimal analysis decisions. In this paper, we first review different forms of Bayesian information criteria that could be computed for psychometric models. We then consider best practices, highlighting computational pitfalls that can occur even when one is attempting to follow best practices. Finally, we provide recommendations for the metrics’ practical uses. The paper is intended to clarify conflicting recommendations from the literature and to raise awareness about ways that information criteria can behave unexpectedly.

Keyword(s)

Bayesian models information criteria WAIC Bayesian psychometrics

Persistent Identifier

Date of first publication

2026-03-12

Journal title

Methodology

Publisher

PsychArchives

Publication status

acceptedVersion

Review status

reviewed

Is version of

Citation

Merkle, Edgar C. (in press). Nuances of information criteria for Bayesian psychometric models [Author Accepted Manuscript]. Methodology. https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.21756
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Merkle, Edgar C.
  • PsychArchives acquisition timestamp
    2026-03-12T09:26:31Z
  • Made available on
    2026-03-12T09:26:31Z
  • Date of first publication
    2026-03-12
  • Abstract / Description
    It is common practice to compare Bayesian psychometric models via information criteria such as DIC and WAIC. Especially because these criteria can be automatically computed by MCMC software, it is easy to ignore the intricacies related to their computation. This often leads researchers to use noisy criteria that may lead to suboptimal analysis decisions. In this paper, we first review different forms of Bayesian information criteria that could be computed for psychometric models. We then consider best practices, highlighting computational pitfalls that can occur even when one is attempting to follow best practices. Finally, we provide recommendations for the metrics’ practical uses. The paper is intended to clarify conflicting recommendations from the literature and to raise awareness about ways that information criteria can behave unexpectedly.
    en
  • Publication status
    acceptedVersion
  • Review status
    reviewed
  • Sponsorship
    This work was made possible through funding from the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, Grant R305D210044.
  • Citation
    Merkle, Edgar C. (in press). Nuances of information criteria for Bayesian psychometric models [Author Accepted Manuscript]. Methodology. https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.21756
  • ISSN
    1614-2241
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/17132
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.21756
  • Language of content
    eng
  • Publisher
    PsychArchives
  • Is version of
    https://doi.org/10.5964/meth.20361
  • Keyword(s)
    Bayesian models
  • Keyword(s)
    information criteria
  • Keyword(s)
    WAIC
  • Keyword(s)
    Bayesian psychometrics
  • Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)
    150
  • Title
    Nuances of information criteria for Bayesian psychometric models [Author Accepted Manuscript]
    en
  • DRO type
    article
  • Journal title
    Methodology
  • Visible tag(s)
    PsychOpen GOLD
  • Visible tag(s)
    Accepted Manuscript