Nuances of information criteria for Bayesian psychometric models [Author Accepted Manuscript]
Author(s) / Creator(s)
Merkle, Edgar C.
Abstract / Description
It is common practice to compare Bayesian psychometric models via information criteria such as DIC and WAIC. Especially because these criteria can be automatically computed by MCMC software, it is easy to ignore the intricacies related to their computation. This often leads researchers to use noisy criteria that may lead to suboptimal analysis decisions. In this paper, we first review different forms of Bayesian information criteria that could be computed for psychometric models. We then consider best practices, highlighting computational pitfalls that can occur even when one is attempting to follow best practices. Finally, we provide recommendations for the metrics’ practical uses. The paper is intended to clarify conflicting recommendations from the literature and to raise awareness about ways that information criteria can behave unexpectedly.
Keyword(s)
Bayesian models information criteria WAIC Bayesian psychometricsPersistent Identifier
Date of first publication
2026-03-12
Journal title
Methodology
Publisher
PsychArchives
Publication status
acceptedVersion
Review status
reviewed
Is version of
Citation
Merkle, Edgar C. (in press). Nuances of information criteria for Bayesian psychometric models [Author Accepted Manuscript]. Methodology. https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.21756
-
Merkle_2026_Nuances_of_information_criteria_for_Bayesian_psychometric_models_METH_AAM.pdfAdobe PDF - 245.02KBMD5 : 09992b0af72b6464440d6ee1d7557626Description: Accepted Manuscript
-
There are no other versions of this object.
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Merkle, Edgar C.
-
PsychArchives acquisition timestamp2026-03-12T09:26:31Z
-
Made available on2026-03-12T09:26:31Z
-
Date of first publication2026-03-12
-
Abstract / DescriptionIt is common practice to compare Bayesian psychometric models via information criteria such as DIC and WAIC. Especially because these criteria can be automatically computed by MCMC software, it is easy to ignore the intricacies related to their computation. This often leads researchers to use noisy criteria that may lead to suboptimal analysis decisions. In this paper, we first review different forms of Bayesian information criteria that could be computed for psychometric models. We then consider best practices, highlighting computational pitfalls that can occur even when one is attempting to follow best practices. Finally, we provide recommendations for the metrics’ practical uses. The paper is intended to clarify conflicting recommendations from the literature and to raise awareness about ways that information criteria can behave unexpectedly.en
-
Publication statusacceptedVersion
-
Review statusreviewed
-
SponsorshipThis work was made possible through funding from the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, Grant R305D210044.
-
CitationMerkle, Edgar C. (in press). Nuances of information criteria for Bayesian psychometric models [Author Accepted Manuscript]. Methodology. https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.21756
-
ISSN1614-2241
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/17132
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.21756
-
Language of contenteng
-
PublisherPsychArchives
-
Is version ofhttps://doi.org/10.5964/meth.20361
-
Keyword(s)Bayesian models
-
Keyword(s)information criteria
-
Keyword(s)WAIC
-
Keyword(s)Bayesian psychometrics
-
Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)150
-
TitleNuances of information criteria for Bayesian psychometric models [Author Accepted Manuscript]en
-
DRO typearticle
-
Journal titleMethodology
-
Visible tag(s)PsychOpen GOLD
-
Visible tag(s)Accepted Manuscript