Aftermath of the Stapel case: more alarming data, the beggining of change?
Author(s) / Creator(s)
Budzicz, Łukasz
Abstract / Description
This article adds to the discussion that took place in Psychologia Społeczna (no. 3/2012) concerning the reliability of research findings in social psychology. In recent years a number of new data indicated that Stapel᾿s fraud might not have been an isolated case, but a symptom of a larger crisis. Even if most researchers do not fabricate data, subtle falsification involving arbitrary data processing and selective presentation of results may be relatively frequent and lead to a distorted picture of reality. Especially telling in this context are analyses, that show improbable distributions of p-values (p-curve analysis), distortions in reporting p-values, and very low cumulative statistical power of research studies. This article presents the most important voices about how to change research and publication practices. Described were examples where such changes have already been initiated.
Keyword(s)
Stapel's fraud reliability of data in psychology false-positive psychology statistical powerPersistent Identifier
Date of first publication
2015
Journal title
Psychologia Społeczna
Volume
10
Issue
35
Page numbers
419-434
Publisher
Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar
Publication status
publishedVersion
Review status
peerReviewed
Is version of
Citation
-
Budzicz_PS_4_2015.pdfAdobe PDF - 322.11KBMD5: 21afee97c0aa9e59ca85068a75a968ca
-
There are no other versions of this object.
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Budzicz, Łukasz
-
PsychArchives acquisition timestamp2025-07-10T14:32:26Z
-
Made available on2025-07-10T14:32:26Z
-
Date of first publication2015
-
Abstract / DescriptionThis article adds to the discussion that took place in Psychologia Społeczna (no. 3/2012) concerning the reliability of research findings in social psychology. In recent years a number of new data indicated that Stapel᾿s fraud might not have been an isolated case, but a symptom of a larger crisis. Even if most researchers do not fabricate data, subtle falsification involving arbitrary data processing and selective presentation of results may be relatively frequent and lead to a distorted picture of reality. Especially telling in this context are analyses, that show improbable distributions of p-values (p-curve analysis), distortions in reporting p-values, and very low cumulative statistical power of research studies. This article presents the most important voices about how to change research and publication practices. Described were examples where such changes have already been initiated.en
-
Publication statuspublishedVersion
-
Review statuspeerReviewed
-
ISSN1896-1800
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/12125
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.16721
-
Language of contentpol
-
PublisherWydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar
-
Is version ofhttps://doi.org/10.7366/1896180020153505
-
Keyword(s)Stapel's frauden
-
Keyword(s)reliability of data in psychologyen
-
Keyword(s)false-positive psychologyen
-
Keyword(s)statistical poweren
-
Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)150
-
TitleAftermath of the Stapel case: more alarming data, the beggining of change?en
-
DRO typearticle
-
Issue35
-
Journal titlePsychologia Społeczna
-
Page numbers419-434
-
Volume10
-
Visible tag(s)Version of Record