Article Version of Record

Health scares: Tracing their nature, growth and spread

Author(s) / Creator(s)

MacKrill, Kate
Witthöft, Michael
Wessely, Simon
Petrie, Keith J.

Abstract / Description

Background: Health scares are highly publicised threats to health that increase public concern and protective behaviours but are later shown to be unfounded. Although health scares have become more common in recent times, they have received very little research attention. This is despite the fact that health scares often have negative outcomes for individuals and community by affecting health behaviours and causing high levels of often unnecessary anxiety. Method: In this paper we undertook a review and analysis of the major types of health scares as well as the background factors associated with health scares and their spread. Results: We found most health scares fell into seven main categories; environmental contaminants, food, malicious incidents, medical treatments, public health interventions, radiation from technology and exotic diseases. For most health scares there are important background factors and incident characteristics that affect how they develop. Background factors include conspiracy theories, trust in governmental agencies, anxiety, modern health worries and wariness of chemicals. Incident characteristic include being newly developed, not understood or unseen, man-made rather than natural and whether the incident is out of personal control. We also identified the aspects of traditional and social media that exacerbate the rapid spread of health scares. Conclusion: More research is needed to identify the characteristics of media stories that intensify the levels of public concern. Guidelines around the media’s reporting of health incidents and potential health threats may be necessary in order to reduce levels of public anxiety and the negative public health impact of health scares.

Keyword(s)

health scares media environmental incidents technology nocebo effect

Persistent Identifier

Date of first publication

2023-12-22

Journal title

Clinical Psychology in Europe

Volume

5

Issue

4

Article number

Article e12209

Publisher

PsychOpen GOLD

Publication status

publishedVersion

Review status

peerReviewed

Is version of

Citation

MacKrill, K., Witthöft, M., Wessely, S., & Petrie, K. J. (2023). Health scares: Tracing their nature, growth and spread. Clinical Psychology in Europe, 5(4), Article e12209. https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.12209
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    MacKrill, Kate
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Witthöft, Michael
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Wessely, Simon
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Petrie, Keith J.
  • PsychArchives acquisition timestamp
    2024-03-19T11:01:50Z
  • Made available on
    2024-03-19T11:01:50Z
  • Date of first publication
    2023-12-22
  • Abstract / Description
    Background: Health scares are highly publicised threats to health that increase public concern and protective behaviours but are later shown to be unfounded. Although health scares have become more common in recent times, they have received very little research attention. This is despite the fact that health scares often have negative outcomes for individuals and community by affecting health behaviours and causing high levels of often unnecessary anxiety. Method: In this paper we undertook a review and analysis of the major types of health scares as well as the background factors associated with health scares and their spread. Results: We found most health scares fell into seven main categories; environmental contaminants, food, malicious incidents, medical treatments, public health interventions, radiation from technology and exotic diseases. For most health scares there are important background factors and incident characteristics that affect how they develop. Background factors include conspiracy theories, trust in governmental agencies, anxiety, modern health worries and wariness of chemicals. Incident characteristic include being newly developed, not understood or unseen, man-made rather than natural and whether the incident is out of personal control. We also identified the aspects of traditional and social media that exacerbate the rapid spread of health scares. Conclusion: More research is needed to identify the characteristics of media stories that intensify the levels of public concern. Guidelines around the media’s reporting of health incidents and potential health threats may be necessary in order to reduce levels of public anxiety and the negative public health impact of health scares.
    en_US
  • Publication status
    publishedVersion
  • Review status
    peerReviewed
  • Citation
    MacKrill, K., Witthöft, M., Wessely, S., & Petrie, K. J. (2023). Health scares: Tracing their nature, growth and spread. Clinical Psychology in Europe, 5(4), Article e12209. https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.12209
    en_US
  • ISSN
    2625-3410
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/9728
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.14269
  • Language of content
    eng
  • Publisher
    PsychOpen GOLD
  • Is version of
    https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.12209
  • Keyword(s)
    health scares
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    media
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    environmental incidents
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    technology
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    nocebo effect
    en_US
  • Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)
    150
  • Title
    Health scares: Tracing their nature, growth and spread
    en_US
  • DRO type
    article
  • Article number
    Article e12209
  • Issue
    4
  • Journal title
    Clinical Psychology in Europe
  • Volume
    5
  • Visible tag(s)
    Version of Record
    en_US