Health scares: Tracing their nature, growth and spread
Author(s) / Creator(s)
MacKrill, Kate
Witthöft, Michael
Wessely, Simon
Petrie, Keith J.
Abstract / Description
Background: Health scares are highly publicised threats to health that increase public concern and protective behaviours but are later shown to be unfounded. Although health scares have become more common in recent times, they have received very little research attention. This is despite the fact that health scares often have negative outcomes for individuals and community by affecting health behaviours and causing high levels of often unnecessary anxiety. Method: In this paper we undertook a review and analysis of the major types of health scares as well as the background factors associated with health scares and their spread. Results: We found most health scares fell into seven main categories; environmental contaminants, food, malicious incidents, medical treatments, public health interventions, radiation from technology and exotic diseases. For most health scares there are important background factors and incident characteristics that affect how they develop. Background factors include conspiracy theories, trust in governmental agencies, anxiety, modern health worries and wariness of chemicals. Incident characteristic include being newly developed, not understood or unseen, man-made rather than natural and whether the incident is out of personal control. We also identified the aspects of traditional and social media that exacerbate the rapid spread of health scares. Conclusion: More research is needed to identify the characteristics of media stories that intensify the levels of public concern. Guidelines around the media’s reporting of health incidents and potential health threats may be necessary in order to reduce levels of public anxiety and the negative public health impact of health scares.
Keyword(s)
health scares media environmental incidents technology nocebo effectPersistent Identifier
Date of first publication
2023-12-22
Journal title
Clinical Psychology in Europe
Volume
5
Issue
4
Article number
Article e12209
Publisher
PsychOpen GOLD
Publication status
publishedVersion
Review status
peerReviewed
Is version of
Citation
MacKrill, K., Witthöft, M., Wessely, S., & Petrie, K. J. (2023). Health scares: Tracing their nature, growth and spread. Clinical Psychology in Europe, 5(4), Article e12209. https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.12209
-
cpe.v5i4.12209.pdfAdobe PDF - 435.8KBMD5: 8dab00e0098f2fe0d3d6720bd5843bbd
-
There are no other versions of this object.
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)MacKrill, Kate
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Witthöft, Michael
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Wessely, Simon
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Petrie, Keith J.
-
PsychArchives acquisition timestamp2024-03-19T11:01:50Z
-
Made available on2024-03-19T11:01:50Z
-
Date of first publication2023-12-22
-
Abstract / DescriptionBackground: Health scares are highly publicised threats to health that increase public concern and protective behaviours but are later shown to be unfounded. Although health scares have become more common in recent times, they have received very little research attention. This is despite the fact that health scares often have negative outcomes for individuals and community by affecting health behaviours and causing high levels of often unnecessary anxiety. Method: In this paper we undertook a review and analysis of the major types of health scares as well as the background factors associated with health scares and their spread. Results: We found most health scares fell into seven main categories; environmental contaminants, food, malicious incidents, medical treatments, public health interventions, radiation from technology and exotic diseases. For most health scares there are important background factors and incident characteristics that affect how they develop. Background factors include conspiracy theories, trust in governmental agencies, anxiety, modern health worries and wariness of chemicals. Incident characteristic include being newly developed, not understood or unseen, man-made rather than natural and whether the incident is out of personal control. We also identified the aspects of traditional and social media that exacerbate the rapid spread of health scares. Conclusion: More research is needed to identify the characteristics of media stories that intensify the levels of public concern. Guidelines around the media’s reporting of health incidents and potential health threats may be necessary in order to reduce levels of public anxiety and the negative public health impact of health scares.en_US
-
Publication statuspublishedVersion
-
Review statuspeerReviewed
-
CitationMacKrill, K., Witthöft, M., Wessely, S., & Petrie, K. J. (2023). Health scares: Tracing their nature, growth and spread. Clinical Psychology in Europe, 5(4), Article e12209. https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.12209en_US
-
ISSN2625-3410
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/9728
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.14269
-
Language of contenteng
-
PublisherPsychOpen GOLD
-
Is version ofhttps://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.12209
-
Keyword(s)health scaresen_US
-
Keyword(s)mediaen_US
-
Keyword(s)environmental incidentsen_US
-
Keyword(s)technologyen_US
-
Keyword(s)nocebo effecten_US
-
Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)150
-
TitleHealth scares: Tracing their nature, growth and spreaden_US
-
DRO typearticle
-
Article numberArticle e12209
-
Issue4
-
Journal titleClinical Psychology in Europe
-
Volume5
-
Visible tag(s)Version of Recorden_US