Power Distance Moderates the Relation Between Income Inequality and Life Satisfaction: A Cross-Country Longitudinal Analysis
This article is a preprint and has not been certified by peer review [What does this mean?].
Author(s) / Creator(s)
Giuntoli, Laura
Kusano, Kodai
Maass, Anne
Abstract / Description
Despite extensive research, the reasons why some countries experience negative consequences of income inequality
on life satisfaction while others exhibit neutral or even positive outcomes remain ambiguous. By utilizing state-ofthe-
art methodology for cross-country longitudinal data, the disaggregation of within- and between-country effects
of income inequality effectively elucidates diverse processes operating at these distinct levels of analysis.
Our study, spanning 2006 to 2022 and including 113 countries representative of all world regions, combines
individual-level variables retrieved from the Gallup World Poll and country-level indicators obtained from various
public databases. Multilevel analyses show a within-country effect of income inequality, with short-term increases
over time associated to a lower life satisfaction in most countries. At the between-country level, power distance, a
cultural dimension reflecting the extent to which a society tolerates disparities in social structures, offers an
explanation for the contradictory relationship between income inequality and life satisfaction. In low power distance
countries, characterized by a cultural aversion to inequality, higher levels of income inequality significantly predict
lower life satisfaction. Conversely, in high power distance countries, where there is a cultural tendency to accept
socioeconomic disparities among people, the effect of income inequality on life satisfaction is statistically null. The
robustness of the results is supported by employing three different measures of income inequality and controlling for
income at both the individual and country levels. We provide a solid methodological and cultural interpretation,
above and beyond basic economic variables investigated in past research, for inconsistent previous findings reported
in cross-national studies.
Keyword(s)
Power Distance Income inequality Economic inequality Hybrid regressions Life satisfaction Gallup World PollPersistent Identifier
Date of first publication
2024-03-01
Publisher
PsychArchives
Citation
-
GiuntoliKusanoMaass_PowerDistanceModeratesIncomeInequalty.pdfAdobe PDF - 1.48MBMD5: 7fb0cade003dc065db439b72b3e7ff14
-
There are no other versions of this object.
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Giuntoli, Laura
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Kusano, Kodai
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Maass, Anne
-
PsychArchives acquisition timestamp2024-03-01T11:43:13Z
-
Made available on2024-03-01T11:43:13Z
-
Date of first publication2024-03-01
-
Submission date2024-02-28
-
Abstract / DescriptionDespite extensive research, the reasons why some countries experience negative consequences of income inequality on life satisfaction while others exhibit neutral or even positive outcomes remain ambiguous. By utilizing state-ofthe- art methodology for cross-country longitudinal data, the disaggregation of within- and between-country effects of income inequality effectively elucidates diverse processes operating at these distinct levels of analysis. Our study, spanning 2006 to 2022 and including 113 countries representative of all world regions, combines individual-level variables retrieved from the Gallup World Poll and country-level indicators obtained from various public databases. Multilevel analyses show a within-country effect of income inequality, with short-term increases over time associated to a lower life satisfaction in most countries. At the between-country level, power distance, a cultural dimension reflecting the extent to which a society tolerates disparities in social structures, offers an explanation for the contradictory relationship between income inequality and life satisfaction. In low power distance countries, characterized by a cultural aversion to inequality, higher levels of income inequality significantly predict lower life satisfaction. Conversely, in high power distance countries, where there is a cultural tendency to accept socioeconomic disparities among people, the effect of income inequality on life satisfaction is statistically null. The robustness of the results is supported by employing three different measures of income inequality and controlling for income at both the individual and country levels. We provide a solid methodological and cultural interpretation, above and beyond basic economic variables investigated in past research, for inconsistent previous findings reported in cross-national studies.en
-
Publication statusotheren
-
Review statusnotRevieweden
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/9671
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.14208
-
Language of contenteng
-
PublisherPsychArchivesen
-
Keyword(s)Power Distanceen
-
Keyword(s)Income inequalityen
-
Keyword(s)Economic inequalityen
-
Keyword(s)Hybrid regressionsen
-
Keyword(s)Life satisfactionen
-
Keyword(s)Gallup World Pollen
-
Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)150
-
TitlePower Distance Moderates the Relation Between Income Inequality and Life Satisfaction: A Cross-Country Longitudinal Analysisen
-
DRO typepreprinten