Article Version of Record

Evaluation of Ten Psychometric Criteria for Circumplex Structure

Author(s) / Creator(s)

Acton, G. Scott
Revelle, William

Abstract / Description

This study tested for sensitivity to circumplex structure in six existing and four new psychometric criteria that assess the circumplex properties of interstitiality, equal spacing, constant radius, and no preferred rotation. Simulations showed one criterion to be sensitive to equal versus unequal axes (Fisher Test) and four to be sensitive to interstitiality versus simple structure (Gap Test, Variance Test 2, Rotation Test, and Minkowski Test). Five criteria were ineffective (Squared Loadings Index, Gap* Test, Gap Difference Test, Cosine Difference Test, and Variance Test 1). Deviation scoring improved the effectiveness of most criteria and is thus recommended for assessing circumplex structure. This study provides new and effective means for discovering complex interrelations of variables where they exist. The circumplex, which falls in the middle of a hierarchy of models in degree of parsimony, may most accurately reflect a complex domain.

Keyword(s)

circumplex simple structure simulation factor analysis

Persistent Identifier

Date of first publication

2004

Journal title

Methods of Psychological Research

Volume

9

Issue

1

Page numbers

1-27

Publisher

Department of Psychology - University of Koblenz-Landau

Publication status

publishedVersion

Review status

unknown

Citation

  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Acton, G. Scott
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Revelle, William
  • PsychArchives acquisition timestamp
    2023-04-25T14:26:10Z
  • Made available on
    2023-04-25T14:26:10Z
  • Date of first publication
    2004
  • Abstract / Description
    This study tested for sensitivity to circumplex structure in six existing and four new psychometric criteria that assess the circumplex properties of interstitiality, equal spacing, constant radius, and no preferred rotation. Simulations showed one criterion to be sensitive to equal versus unequal axes (Fisher Test) and four to be sensitive to interstitiality versus simple structure (Gap Test, Variance Test 2, Rotation Test, and Minkowski Test). Five criteria were ineffective (Squared Loadings Index, Gap* Test, Gap Difference Test, Cosine Difference Test, and Variance Test 1). Deviation scoring improved the effectiveness of most criteria and is thus recommended for assessing circumplex structure. This study provides new and effective means for discovering complex interrelations of variables where they exist. The circumplex, which falls in the middle of a hierarchy of models in degree of parsimony, may most accurately reflect a complex domain.
    en
  • Publication status
    publishedVersion
  • Review status
    unknown
  • ISSN
    1432-8534
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/8316
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.12793
  • Language of content
    eng
  • Publisher
    Department of Psychology - University of Koblenz-Landau
  • Keyword(s)
    circumplex
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    simple structure
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    simulation
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    factor analysis
    en_US
  • Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)
    150
  • Title
    Evaluation of Ten Psychometric Criteria for Circumplex Structure
    en_US
  • DRO type
    article
  • Issue
    1
  • Journal title
    Methods of Psychological Research
  • Page numbers
    1-27
  • Volume
    9
  • Visible tag(s)
    Version of Record