Article Version of Record

Individual differences in numerical comparison is independent of numerical precision

Author(s) / Creator(s)

Prather, Richard

Abstract / Description

Numeracy, as measured by performance on the non-symbolic numerical comparison task, is a key construct in numerical and mathematical cognition. The current study examines individual variation in performance on the numerical comparison task. We contrast the hypothesis that performance on the numerical comparison task is primarily due to more accurate representations of numbers with the hypothesis that performance dependent on decision-making factors. We present data from two behavioral experiments and a mathematical model. In both behavioral experiments we measure the precision of participant’s numerical value representation using a free response estimation task. Taken together, results suggest that individual variation in numerical comparison performance is not predicted by variation in the precision of participants’ numerical value representation.

Keyword(s)

estimation non-symbolic precision modeling

Persistent Identifier

Date of first publication

2019-08-22

Journal title

Journal of Numerical Cognition

Volume

5

Issue

2

Page numbers

220–240

Publisher

PsychOpen GOLD

Publication status

publishedVersion

Review status

peerReviewed

Is version of

Citation

Prather, R. (2019). Individual differences in numerical comparison is independent of numerical precision. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 5(2), 220-240. https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.v5i2.164
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Prather, Richard
  • PsychArchives acquisition timestamp
    2022-04-14T11:21:34Z
  • Made available on
    2022-04-14T11:21:34Z
  • Date of first publication
    2019-08-22
  • Abstract / Description
    Numeracy, as measured by performance on the non-symbolic numerical comparison task, is a key construct in numerical and mathematical cognition. The current study examines individual variation in performance on the numerical comparison task. We contrast the hypothesis that performance on the numerical comparison task is primarily due to more accurate representations of numbers with the hypothesis that performance dependent on decision-making factors. We present data from two behavioral experiments and a mathematical model. In both behavioral experiments we measure the precision of participant’s numerical value representation using a free response estimation task. Taken together, results suggest that individual variation in numerical comparison performance is not predicted by variation in the precision of participants’ numerical value representation.
    en_US
  • Publication status
    publishedVersion
  • Review status
    peerReviewed
  • Citation
    Prather, R. (2019). Individual differences in numerical comparison is independent of numerical precision. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 5(2), 220-240. https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.v5i2.164
    en_US
  • ISSN
    2363-8761
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/5456
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.6060
  • Language of content
    eng
  • Publisher
    PsychOpen GOLD
  • Is version of
    https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.v5i2.164
  • Is related to
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.2518
  • Keyword(s)
    estimation
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    non-symbolic
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    precision
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    modeling
    en_US
  • Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)
    150
  • Title
    Individual differences in numerical comparison is independent of numerical precision
    en_US
  • DRO type
    article
  • Issue
    2
  • Journal title
    Journal of Numerical Cognition
  • Page numbers
    220–240
  • Volume
    5
  • Visible tag(s)
    Version of Record
    en_US