Article Version of Record

Adjusting group intercept and slope bias in predictive equations

Author(s) / Creator(s)

Austin, Bruce W.
French, Brian F.

Abstract / Description

Methods to assess measurement invariance in constructs have received much attention, as invariance is critical for accurate group comparisons. Less attention has been given to the identification and correction of the sources of non-invariance in predictive equations. This work developed correction factors for structural intercept and slope bias in common regression equations to address calls in the literature to revive test bias research. We demonstrated the correction factors in regression analyses within the context of a large international dataset containing 68 countries and regions (groups). A mathematics achievement score was predicted by a math self-efficacy score, which exhibited a lack of invariance across groups. The proposed correction factors significantly corrected structural intercept and slope bias across groups. The impact of the correction factors was greatest for groups with the largest amount of bias. Implications for both practice and methodological extensions are discussed.

Keyword(s)

invariance noninvariance predictive bias test bias intercept bias slope bias multigroup

Persistent Identifier

Date of first publication

2020-09-30

Journal title

Methodology

Volume

16

Issue

3

Page numbers

241–257

Publisher

PsychOpen GOLD

Publication status

publishedVersion

Review status

peerReviewed

Is version of

Citation

Austin, B. W., & French, B. F. (2020). Adjusting group intercept and slope bias in predictive equations. Methodology, 16(3), 241-257. https://doi.org/10.5964/meth.4001
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Austin, Bruce W.
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    French, Brian F.
  • PsychArchives acquisition timestamp
    2022-04-14T11:24:43Z
  • Made available on
    2022-04-14T11:24:43Z
  • Date of first publication
    2020-09-30
  • Abstract / Description
    Methods to assess measurement invariance in constructs have received much attention, as invariance is critical for accurate group comparisons. Less attention has been given to the identification and correction of the sources of non-invariance in predictive equations. This work developed correction factors for structural intercept and slope bias in common regression equations to address calls in the literature to revive test bias research. We demonstrated the correction factors in regression analyses within the context of a large international dataset containing 68 countries and regions (groups). A mathematics achievement score was predicted by a math self-efficacy score, which exhibited a lack of invariance across groups. The proposed correction factors significantly corrected structural intercept and slope bias across groups. The impact of the correction factors was greatest for groups with the largest amount of bias. Implications for both practice and methodological extensions are discussed.
    en_US
  • Publication status
    publishedVersion
  • Review status
    peerReviewed
  • Citation
    Austin, B. W., & French, B. F. (2020). Adjusting group intercept and slope bias in predictive equations. Methodology, 16(3), 241-257. https://doi.org/10.5964/meth.4001
    en_US
  • ISSN
    1614-2241
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/5695
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.6299
  • Language of content
    eng
  • Publisher
    PsychOpen GOLD
  • Is version of
    https://doi.org/10.5964/meth.4001
  • Is related to
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.3465
  • Keyword(s)
    invariance
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    noninvariance
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    predictive bias
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    test bias
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    intercept bias
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    slope bias
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    multigroup
    en_US
  • Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)
    150
  • Title
    Adjusting group intercept and slope bias in predictive equations
    en_US
  • DRO type
    article
  • Issue
    3
  • Journal title
    Methodology
  • Page numbers
    241–257
  • Volume
    16
  • Visible tag(s)
    Version of Record
    en_US