Article Version of Record

Proximal versus distal ecological stress: Socio-ecological influences on political freedom, well-being, and societal confidence in 159 nations

Author(s) / Creator(s)

Conway, Lucian Gideon
Chan, Linus
Woodard, Shailee R.
Joshanloo, Mohsen

Abstract / Description

Previous work from a socio-ecological perspective reveals that ecological stress has important effects on political, cultural, and psychological outcomes. However, that work has been limited by (1) a focus on distal forms of ecological stress that are hard for societies to control, and (2) a lack of large-scale conceptual replications. The present study aims to fill in these gaps by simultaneously testing the effects of both more distal ecological stress (e.g., climate) and more proximal ecological stress (e.g., water quality) on political restriction, political freedom, well-being, and societal confidence measurements. In a sample from the Gallup World Poll spanning over one and a half million participants and 159 nations, we found that while both kinds of ecological stress measurements predicted greater vertical political restriction, reduced horizontal political restriction, reduced well-being, and reduced freedom, only proximal forms of ecological stress predicted a loss in societal confidence. These results not only provide key conceptual replications of prior studies on new data, they also add previously unstudied outcomes and new ecological stressors. As a result, they help us better understand contributing factors to key societal issues such as freedom, well-being, and societal confidence.

Keyword(s)

ecological stress distal proximal freedom well-being confidence

Persistent Identifier

Date of first publication

2021-07-26

Journal title

Journal of Social and Political Psychology

Volume

9

Issue

1

Page numbers

306–320

Publisher

PsychOpen GOLD

Publication status

publishedVersion

Review status

peerReviewed

Is version of

Citation

Conway, L. G., Chan, L., Woodard, S. R., & Joshanloo, M. (2021). Proximal versus distal ecological stress: Socio-ecological influences on political freedom, well-being, and societal confidence in 159 nations. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 9(1), 306-320. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.5927
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Conway, Lucian Gideon
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Chan, Linus
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Woodard, Shailee R.
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Joshanloo, Mohsen
  • PsychArchives acquisition timestamp
    2026-05-12T13:03:27Z
  • Made available on
    2026-05-12T13:03:27Z
  • Date of first publication
    2021-07-26
  • Abstract / Description
    Previous work from a socio-ecological perspective reveals that ecological stress has important effects on political, cultural, and psychological outcomes. However, that work has been limited by (1) a focus on distal forms of ecological stress that are hard for societies to control, and (2) a lack of large-scale conceptual replications. The present study aims to fill in these gaps by simultaneously testing the effects of both more distal ecological stress (e.g., climate) and more proximal ecological stress (e.g., water quality) on political restriction, political freedom, well-being, and societal confidence measurements. In a sample from the Gallup World Poll spanning over one and a half million participants and 159 nations, we found that while both kinds of ecological stress measurements predicted greater vertical political restriction, reduced horizontal political restriction, reduced well-being, and reduced freedom, only proximal forms of ecological stress predicted a loss in societal confidence. These results not only provide key conceptual replications of prior studies on new data, they also add previously unstudied outcomes and new ecological stressors. As a result, they help us better understand contributing factors to key societal issues such as freedom, well-being, and societal confidence.
    en_US
  • Publication status
    publishedVersion
  • Review status
    peerReviewed
  • Citation
    Conway, L. G., Chan, L., Woodard, S. R., & Joshanloo, M. (2021). Proximal versus distal ecological stress: Socio-ecological influences on political freedom, well-being, and societal confidence in 159 nations. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 9(1), 306-320. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.5927
  • ISSN
    2195-3325
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/17415
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.22053
  • Language of content
    eng
  • Publisher
    PsychOpen GOLD
  • Is version of
    https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.5927
  • Is related to
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.4966
  • Is related to
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.4967
  • Keyword(s)
    ecological stress
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    distal
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    proximal
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    freedom
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    well-being
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    confidence
    en_US
  • Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)
    150
  • Title
    Proximal versus distal ecological stress: Socio-ecological influences on political freedom, well-being, and societal confidence in 159 nations
    en_US
  • DRO type
    article
  • Issue
    1
  • Journal title
    Journal of Social and Political Psychology
  • Page numbers
    306–320
  • Volume
    9
  • Visible tag(s)
    Version of Record