Proximal versus distal ecological stress: Socio-ecological influences on political freedom, well-being, and societal confidence in 159 nations
Author(s) / Creator(s)
Conway, Lucian Gideon
Chan, Linus
Woodard, Shailee R.
Joshanloo, Mohsen
Abstract / Description
Previous work from a socio-ecological perspective reveals that ecological stress has important effects on political, cultural, and psychological outcomes. However, that work has been limited by (1) a focus on distal forms of ecological stress that are hard for societies to control, and (2) a lack of large-scale conceptual replications. The present study aims to fill in these gaps by simultaneously testing the effects of both more distal ecological stress (e.g., climate) and more proximal ecological stress (e.g., water quality) on political restriction, political freedom, well-being, and societal confidence measurements. In a sample from the Gallup World Poll spanning over one and a half million participants and 159 nations, we found that while both kinds of ecological stress measurements predicted greater vertical political restriction, reduced horizontal political restriction, reduced well-being, and reduced freedom, only proximal forms of ecological stress predicted a loss in societal confidence. These results not only provide key conceptual replications of prior studies on new data, they also add previously unstudied outcomes and new ecological stressors. As a result, they help us better understand contributing factors to key societal issues such as freedom, well-being, and societal confidence.
Keyword(s)
ecological stress distal proximal freedom well-being confidencePersistent Identifier
Date of first publication
2021-07-26
Journal title
Journal of Social and Political Psychology
Volume
9
Issue
1
Page numbers
306–320
Publisher
PsychOpen GOLD
Publication status
publishedVersion
Review status
peerReviewed
Is version of
Citation
Conway, L. G., Chan, L., Woodard, S. R., & Joshanloo, M. (2021). Proximal versus distal ecological stress: Socio-ecological influences on political freedom, well-being, and societal confidence in 159 nations. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 9(1), 306-320. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.5927
-
jspp.v9i1.5927.pdfAdobe PDF - 290.93KBMD5 : 741612a62f7aa7f6df66bfb70184b41f
-
There are no other versions of this object.
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Conway, Lucian Gideon
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Chan, Linus
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Woodard, Shailee R.
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Joshanloo, Mohsen
-
PsychArchives acquisition timestamp2026-05-12T13:03:27Z
-
Made available on2026-05-12T13:03:27Z
-
Date of first publication2021-07-26
-
Abstract / DescriptionPrevious work from a socio-ecological perspective reveals that ecological stress has important effects on political, cultural, and psychological outcomes. However, that work has been limited by (1) a focus on distal forms of ecological stress that are hard for societies to control, and (2) a lack of large-scale conceptual replications. The present study aims to fill in these gaps by simultaneously testing the effects of both more distal ecological stress (e.g., climate) and more proximal ecological stress (e.g., water quality) on political restriction, political freedom, well-being, and societal confidence measurements. In a sample from the Gallup World Poll spanning over one and a half million participants and 159 nations, we found that while both kinds of ecological stress measurements predicted greater vertical political restriction, reduced horizontal political restriction, reduced well-being, and reduced freedom, only proximal forms of ecological stress predicted a loss in societal confidence. These results not only provide key conceptual replications of prior studies on new data, they also add previously unstudied outcomes and new ecological stressors. As a result, they help us better understand contributing factors to key societal issues such as freedom, well-being, and societal confidence.en_US
-
Publication statuspublishedVersion
-
Review statuspeerReviewed
-
CitationConway, L. G., Chan, L., Woodard, S. R., & Joshanloo, M. (2021). Proximal versus distal ecological stress: Socio-ecological influences on political freedom, well-being, and societal confidence in 159 nations. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 9(1), 306-320. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.5927
-
ISSN2195-3325
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/17415
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.22053
-
Language of contenteng
-
PublisherPsychOpen GOLD
-
Is version ofhttps://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.5927
-
Is related tohttps://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.4966
-
Is related tohttps://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.4967
-
Keyword(s)ecological stressen_US
-
Keyword(s)distalen_US
-
Keyword(s)proximalen_US
-
Keyword(s)freedomen_US
-
Keyword(s)well-beingen_US
-
Keyword(s)confidenceen_US
-
Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)150
-
TitleProximal versus distal ecological stress: Socio-ecological influences on political freedom, well-being, and societal confidence in 159 nationsen_US
-
DRO typearticle
-
Issue1
-
Journal titleJournal of Social and Political Psychology
-
Page numbers306–320
-
Volume9
-
Visible tag(s)Version of Record