Other

Supplementary materials to: Could your candidate shoot someone on 5th Avenue and not lose votes? Identifying “lines in the sand” in ingroup candidate transgressions

Author(s) / Creator(s)

Howard, Kathryn A.
Cervone, Daniel
Motyl, Matt

Abstract / Description

Supplementary materials to: Howard, K. A., Cervone, D., & Motyl, M. (2022). Could your candidate shoot someone on 5th Avenue and not lose votes? Identifying “lines in the sand” in ingroup candidate transgressions. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 10(1), 272–287. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.5453

Keyword(s)

politics decision-making voter-choice ideology morality

Persistent Identifier

Date of first publication

2022

Publisher

PsychOpen GOLD

Is referenced by

Citation

Howard, K. A., Cervone, D., & Motyl, M. (2022). Supplementary materials to: Could your candidate shoot someone on 5th Avenue and not lose votes? Identifying “lines in the sand” in ingroup candidate transgressions [ESM pilot study, main text materials, and additional analyses]. PsychOpen GOLD. https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.7072
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Howard, Kathryn A.
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Cervone, Daniel
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Motyl, Matt
  • PsychArchives acquisition timestamp
    2022-07-04T12:42:52Z
  • Made available on
    2022-07-04T12:42:52Z
  • Date of first publication
    2022
  • Abstract / Description
    Supplementary materials to: Howard, K. A., Cervone, D., & Motyl, M. (2022). Could your candidate shoot someone on 5th Avenue and not lose votes? Identifying “lines in the sand” in ingroup candidate transgressions. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 10(1), 272–287. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.5453
    en_US
  • Table of contents
    JSPP Lines in the Sand ESM Pilot Study Materials: This document contains a description of the Pilot Study used to create the Transgression Severity Scale in the Main Manuscript. It describes the participants who participated in the pilot, as well as the rating and scoring procedure used to select items for the TSS scale. It also contains all instructions, descriptions, and items that participants encountered during the pilot study. JSPP Lines in the Sand ESM Main Text Materials: This document contains all instructions, descriptions, measures, and items that participants saw, and/or completed during the main study. JSPP Lines in the Sand ESM Additional Analyses: This document displays ideological differences in severity perceptions for each of the 70 transgressions. Because some transgressions were perceived to be significantly worse by conservatives than liberals (and vice versa), we performed the same analyses as described in the main text, but only used the transgression items for which there were no ideological differences in severity. This document displays these results.
    en_US
  • Citation
    Howard, K. A., Cervone, D., & Motyl, M. (2022). Supplementary materials to: Could your candidate shoot someone on 5th Avenue and not lose votes? Identifying “lines in the sand” in ingroup candidate transgressions [ESM pilot study, main text materials, and additional analyses]. PsychOpen GOLD. https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.7072
    en_US
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/6373
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.7072
  • Language of content
    eng
    en_US
  • Publisher
    PsychOpen GOLD
    en_US
  • Is referenced by
    https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.5453
  • Keyword(s)
    politics
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    decision-making
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    voter-choice
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    ideology
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    morality
    en_US
  • Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)
    150
  • Title
    Supplementary materials to: Could your candidate shoot someone on 5th Avenue and not lose votes? Identifying “lines in the sand” in ingroup candidate transgressions
    en_US
  • DRO type
    other
    en_US