Supplementary materials for Bou Zeineddine et al 2022 "Unavailable, insecure, and very poorly paid": Global difficulties and inequalities in conducting social psychological research
Author(s) / Creator(s)
Bou Zeineddine, Fouad
Saab, Rim
Kende, Anna
Lasticova, Barbara
Ayanian, Arin
Editor(s)
Segalo, Puleng
Abstract / Description
Supplemental Material A – Demographic Control Results; Supplemental Material B – Full Qualitative Results; Supplemental Material C – Additional Detailed Results; Supplemental Material D – Sample Descriptives
Supplementary materials for: Bou Zeineddine, F., Saab, R., Lášticová, B., Ayanian, A. H., & Kende, A. (2022). “Unavailable, Insecure, and Very Poorly Paid”: Global Difficulties and Inequalities in Conducting Social Psychological Research. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 10(2), 723-742. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.8311
This paper offers an exploration of research production in social psychology as a global endeavor from the point of view of Anglophone social psychologists (N = 232) across 64 countries. We examine social psychologists’ beliefs regarding the difficulties in conducting research in social psychology and the inequalities that they report between the Global North, South and East Europe, and the Global South. Across all regions, we found pervasive critical awareness of obstacles to conducting research – including underinvestment in the field, precarious and counter-productive labor conditions, and excessive and biased disciplinary standards. However, we also found that colleagues outside the Global North reported quantitatively and qualitatively larger obstacles to research. These included well-known historically-rooted inequalities but also contemporary systemic procedural and distributive injustices in material, human, and social-political capital. Non-Northern colleagues in particular critically reflected on how these inequalities and injustices are amplified by Northern hegemonies in social, institutional, disciplinary, economic, and political systems. Discussion focuses on the implications of these results for social psychologists, social psychology as a discipline, and its situation within broader hierarchical systems and their intersectionalities.
Keyword(s)
social psychology research practices precarity inequality coloniality social science academiaPersistent Identifier
Date of first publication
2022-05-27
Publisher
PsychArchives
Is referenced by
Citation
-
Bou Zeineddine et al 2022 SUPPL.pdfAdobe PDF - 561.42KBMD5: ecab5238977365728fff9369633a8553
-
There are no other versions of this object.
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Bou Zeineddine, Fouad
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Saab, Rim
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Kende, Anna
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Lasticova, Barbara
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Ayanian, Arin
-
Editor(s)Segalo, Puleng
-
PsychArchives acquisition timestamp2022-05-27T09:28:43Z
-
Made available on2022-05-27T09:28:43Z
-
Date of first publication2022-05-27
-
Abstract / DescriptionSupplemental Material A – Demographic Control Results; Supplemental Material B – Full Qualitative Results; Supplemental Material C – Additional Detailed Results; Supplemental Material D – Sample Descriptivesen
-
Abstract / DescriptionSupplementary materials for: Bou Zeineddine, F., Saab, R., Lášticová, B., Ayanian, A. H., & Kende, A. (2022). “Unavailable, Insecure, and Very Poorly Paid”: Global Difficulties and Inequalities in Conducting Social Psychological Research. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 10(2), 723-742. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.8311en
-
Abstract / DescriptionThis paper offers an exploration of research production in social psychology as a global endeavor from the point of view of Anglophone social psychologists (N = 232) across 64 countries. We examine social psychologists’ beliefs regarding the difficulties in conducting research in social psychology and the inequalities that they report between the Global North, South and East Europe, and the Global South. Across all regions, we found pervasive critical awareness of obstacles to conducting research – including underinvestment in the field, precarious and counter-productive labor conditions, and excessive and biased disciplinary standards. However, we also found that colleagues outside the Global North reported quantitatively and qualitatively larger obstacles to research. These included well-known historically-rooted inequalities but also contemporary systemic procedural and distributive injustices in material, human, and social-political capital. Non-Northern colleagues in particular critically reflected on how these inequalities and injustices are amplified by Northern hegemonies in social, institutional, disciplinary, economic, and political systems. Discussion focuses on the implications of these results for social psychologists, social psychology as a discipline, and its situation within broader hierarchical systems and their intersectionalities.en
-
Publication statusunknownen
-
Review statusunknownen
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/6201
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.6887
-
Language of contenteng
-
PublisherPsychArchivesen
-
Is referenced byhttps://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.8311
-
Is related tohttps://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.12442
-
Is related tohttps://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.6893
-
Keyword(s)social psychologyen
-
Keyword(s)research practicesen
-
Keyword(s)precarityen
-
Keyword(s)inequalityen
-
Keyword(s)colonialityen
-
Keyword(s)social scienceen
-
Keyword(s)academiaen
-
Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)150
-
TitleSupplementary materials for Bou Zeineddine et al 2022 "Unavailable, insecure, and very poorly paid": Global difficulties and inequalities in conducting social psychological researchen
-
DRO typeotheren