The Association between Boredom and Creativity in Educational Contexts—A Scoping Review on Research Approaches and Empirical Findings
This article is a preprint and has not been certified by peer review [What does this mean?].
Author(s) / Creator(s)
Zeissig, Anke
Kansok-Dusche, Julia
Fischer, Saskia M.
Moeller, Julia
Bilz, Ludwig
Abstract / Description
Assumptions around the association between boredom and creativity are contentious. Although studies suggest positive
effects of boredom, it is also considered a negative predictor of creativity. Researchers also assume that creativity reduces
boredom, but boredom can also occur during creative tasks. In this review, we identify and systematize the empirical
evidence available to date on the association between creativity and boredom in educational contexts.
The string-guided electronic search yielded 2,849 publications. Nineteen publications based on 27 empirical
studies met the inclusion criteria. Two reviewers extracted definitions, theories, methods, operationalizations, measurement
instruments, and outcomes from the studies using a coding scheme.
We identified a range of different theoretical and methodological approaches. The largest cache of empirical
evidence was obtained from experimental and quasi-experimental studies (five positive associations, four negative, two
contradictory, and three insignificant results). Correlation studies identified three negative, one contradictory, and seven
insignificant correlations between boredom and creativity. In addition, two studies with exploratory, statistically not
relevant results contributed to the body of research.
The results from the identified and evaluated studies argue both for and against the sensitivity of creative
processes in relation to boredom—but a clear causal, positive or negative effect of boredom on creativity is not currently
supported by the empirical evidence available. Previous research has also not yet demonstrated an apparent effect of
creative states or traits on academic boredom. Future research should aim to explore under what circumstances different
relationships between boredom and creativity can be observed and reliably replicated.
Persistent Identifier
Date of first publication
2023-12-22
Publisher
PsychArchives
Is version of
Citation
-
Zeißig_et al_PRE-PRINT1_Boredom and Creativity_Scoping Review.pdfAdobe PDF - 965.25KBMD5: 76bc08712f0aad5f4a75267d121a48acDescription: Article under reviewRationale for choice of sharing level: no re-use
-
There are no other versions of this object.
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Zeissig, Anke
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Kansok-Dusche, Julia
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Fischer, Saskia M.
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Moeller, Julia
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Bilz, Ludwig
-
PsychArchives acquisition timestamp2023-12-22T16:42:44Z
-
Made available on2023-12-22T16:42:44Z
-
Date of first publication2023-12-22
-
Abstract / DescriptionAssumptions around the association between boredom and creativity are contentious. Although studies suggest positive effects of boredom, it is also considered a negative predictor of creativity. Researchers also assume that creativity reduces boredom, but boredom can also occur during creative tasks. In this review, we identify and systematize the empirical evidence available to date on the association between creativity and boredom in educational contexts. The string-guided electronic search yielded 2,849 publications. Nineteen publications based on 27 empirical studies met the inclusion criteria. Two reviewers extracted definitions, theories, methods, operationalizations, measurement instruments, and outcomes from the studies using a coding scheme. We identified a range of different theoretical and methodological approaches. The largest cache of empirical evidence was obtained from experimental and quasi-experimental studies (five positive associations, four negative, two contradictory, and three insignificant results). Correlation studies identified three negative, one contradictory, and seven insignificant correlations between boredom and creativity. In addition, two studies with exploratory, statistically not relevant results contributed to the body of research. The results from the identified and evaluated studies argue both for and against the sensitivity of creative processes in relation to boredom—but a clear causal, positive or negative effect of boredom on creativity is not currently supported by the empirical evidence available. Previous research has also not yet demonstrated an apparent effect of creative states or traits on academic boredom. Future research should aim to explore under what circumstances different relationships between boredom and creativity can be observed and reliably replicated.en
-
Publication statusother
-
Review statusnotReviewed
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/9517
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.14041
-
Language of contenteng
-
PublisherPsychArchives
-
Is version ofhttps://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3470
-
Is related tohttps://www.psycharchives.org/handle/20.500.12034/10876
-
Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)150
-
TitleThe Association between Boredom and Creativity in Educational Contexts—A Scoping Review on Research Approaches and Empirical Findingsen
-
DRO typepreprint