Article Version of Record

Can beliefs in justice predict corrupt behavior?

Author(s) / Creator(s)

Stupnianek, Kotryna
Navickas, Vytautas

Abstract / Description

The belief in a just world has been found to be related to rule breaking behavior. However, research has yet to determine whether the same relation holds for corrupt behavior. The current study focused on identifying whether the belief in a just world is a factor that predicts bribery behavior. We hypothesized that people with a weaker belief in a just world would be more likely to report that they had given a bribe compared with people with a strong belief in a just world. A retrospective design was used to conduct a study in Lithuania. Belief in a just world was measured with two scales for assessing personal and general beliefs in a just world. We measured bribery behavior by asking participants (N = 316) to report how many times they had given a bribe during the past 5 years. The results showed that a personal belief in a just world predicted bribery behavior, whereas a general belief in a just world did not. We discuss implications for further studies.

Keyword(s)

belief in a just world corruption bribery Lithuania Baltic States Post-soviet countries

Persistent Identifier

Date of first publication

2019-03-28

Journal title

Journal of Social and Political Psychology

Volume

7

Issue

1

Page numbers

246–259

Publisher

PsychOpen GOLD

Publication status

publishedVersion

Review status

peerReviewed

Is version of

Citation

Stupnianek, K., & Navickas, V. (2019). Can beliefs in justice predict corrupt behavior?. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 7(1), 246-259. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v7i1.1031
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Stupnianek, Kotryna
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Navickas, Vytautas
  • PsychArchives acquisition timestamp
    2022-04-14T11:22:46Z
  • Made available on
    2022-04-14T11:22:46Z
  • Date of first publication
    2019-03-28
  • Abstract / Description
    The belief in a just world has been found to be related to rule breaking behavior. However, research has yet to determine whether the same relation holds for corrupt behavior. The current study focused on identifying whether the belief in a just world is a factor that predicts bribery behavior. We hypothesized that people with a weaker belief in a just world would be more likely to report that they had given a bribe compared with people with a strong belief in a just world. A retrospective design was used to conduct a study in Lithuania. Belief in a just world was measured with two scales for assessing personal and general beliefs in a just world. We measured bribery behavior by asking participants (N = 316) to report how many times they had given a bribe during the past 5 years. The results showed that a personal belief in a just world predicted bribery behavior, whereas a general belief in a just world did not. We discuss implications for further studies.
    en_US
  • Publication status
    publishedVersion
  • Review status
    peerReviewed
  • Citation
    Stupnianek, K., & Navickas, V. (2019). Can beliefs in justice predict corrupt behavior?. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 7(1), 246-259. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v7i1.1031
    en_US
  • ISSN
    2195-3325
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/5560
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.6164
  • Language of content
    eng
  • Publisher
    PsychOpen GOLD
  • Is version of
    https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v7i1.1031
  • Is related to
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.2385
  • Keyword(s)
    belief in a just world
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    corruption
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    bribery
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    Lithuania
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    Baltic States
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    Post-soviet countries
    en_US
  • Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)
    150
  • Title
    Can beliefs in justice predict corrupt behavior?
    en_US
  • DRO type
    article
  • Issue
    1
  • Journal title
    Journal of Social and Political Psychology
  • Page numbers
    246–259
  • Volume
    7
  • Visible tag(s)
    Version of Record
    en_US