Exploring Fragmentation in Emerging Fields of Research
Author(s) / Creator(s)
Petrule, Claudiu
Bittermann, André
Ritter, Viktoria
Haberkamp, Anke
Rief, Winfried
Abstract / Description
Thematic fragmentation within emerging fields can be a sign of positive diversity and dynamic heterogeneity, or a threat to scientific progress and collaboration. Especially a low self-awareness of the field may be crucial, as it could relate to thematic fragments with low exchange of knowledge. We address this issue by analyzing the effects of two measures of fragmentation, self-referentiality and modularity in the citation network, on productivity and collaboration in the research field. Using the emerging field of translational psychotherapy as an example, we apply predictive modeling and examine a time span of 40 years (1982-2021). Results show that normalized self-referentiality (the number of direct citations divided by the number of possible citations within the research field) is positively related to the publication volume over time. In conclusion, the analysis of direct citations between thematic fragments in the research field seems promising for distinguishing between malignant disintegration and benign forms of fragmentation.
Keyword(s)
translational psychotherapy fragmentation translational research self-awareness citation analysis productivity collaboration self-referentialityPersistent Identifier
Date of first publication
2023-10-31
Is part of
METSTI 2023: Workshop on Informetric, Scientometric and Scientific and Technical Information Research, London, UK
Publisher
PsychArchives
Citation
-
Petrule et al_METSTI 2023 Exploring Fragmentation in Emerging Fields of Research.pdfAdobe PDF - 1.49MBMD5: 5f703cb68ae63634a5c752d2b12c4c6c
-
There are no other versions of this object.
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Petrule, Claudiu
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Bittermann, André
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Ritter, Viktoria
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Haberkamp, Anke
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Rief, Winfried
-
PsychArchives acquisition timestamp2023-10-31T15:17:39Z
-
Made available on2023-10-31T15:17:39Z
-
Date of first publication2023-10-31
-
Abstract / DescriptionThematic fragmentation within emerging fields can be a sign of positive diversity and dynamic heterogeneity, or a threat to scientific progress and collaboration. Especially a low self-awareness of the field may be crucial, as it could relate to thematic fragments with low exchange of knowledge. We address this issue by analyzing the effects of two measures of fragmentation, self-referentiality and modularity in the citation network, on productivity and collaboration in the research field. Using the emerging field of translational psychotherapy as an example, we apply predictive modeling and examine a time span of 40 years (1982-2021). Results show that normalized self-referentiality (the number of direct citations divided by the number of possible citations within the research field) is positively related to the publication volume over time. In conclusion, the analysis of direct citations between thematic fragments in the research field seems promising for distinguishing between malignant disintegration and benign forms of fragmentation.en
-
Publication statusunknown
-
Review statusunknown
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/9038
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.13557
-
Language of contenteng
-
PublisherPsychArchives
-
Is part ofMETSTI 2023: Workshop on Informetric, Scientometric and Scientific and Technical Information Research, London, UK
-
Is related tohttps://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.15204
-
Keyword(s)translational psychotherapyen
-
Keyword(s)fragmentationen
-
Keyword(s)translational researchen
-
Keyword(s)self-awarenessen
-
Keyword(s)citation analysisen
-
Keyword(s)productivityen
-
Keyword(s)collaborationen
-
Keyword(s)self-referentialityen
-
Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)150
-
TitleExploring Fragmentation in Emerging Fields of Researchen
-
DRO typeconferenceObject