Article Accepted Manuscript

Not Toeing the Number Line for Simple Arithmetic: Two Large-n Conceptual Replications of Mathieu et al. (Cognition, 2016, Experiment 1)

Author(s) / Creator(s)

Campbell, Jamie
Chen, Yalin
Azhar, Maham

Abstract / Description

We conducted two conceptual replications of Experiment 1 in Mathieu, Gourjon, Couderc, Thevenot, and Prado (2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.10.002). They tested a sample of 34 French adults on mixed-operation blocks of single-digit addition (4 + 3) and subtraction (4 – 3) with the three problem elements (O1, +/-, O2) presented sequentially. Addition was 34 ms faster if O2 appeared 300 ms after the operation sign and displaced 5o to the right of central fixation, whereas subtraction was 19 ms faster when O2 was displaced to the left. Replication Experiment 1 (n = 74 recruited at the University of Saskatchewan) used the same non-zero addition and subtraction problems and trial event sequence as Mathieu et al., but participants completed blocks of pure addition and pure subtraction followed by the mixed-operation condition used by Mathieu et al. Addition RT showed a 32 ms advantage with O2 shifted rightward relative to leftward but only in mixed-operation blocks. There was no effect of O2 position on subtraction RT. Experiment 2 (n = 74) was the same except mixed-operation blocks occurred before the pure-operation blocks. There was an overall 13 ms advantage with O2 shifted right relative to leftward but no interaction with operation or with mixture (i.e., pure vs mixed operations). Nonetheless, the rightward RT advantage was statistically significant for both addition and subtraction only in mixed-operation blocks. Taken together with the robust effects of mixture in Experiment 1, the results suggest that O2 position effects in this paradigm might reflect task specific demands associated with mixed operations.

Keyword(s)

replication simple addition and subtraction spatial attention

Persistent Identifier

Date of first publication

2021-07-01

Journal title

Journal of Numerical Cognition

Publisher

PsychArchives

Publication status

acceptedVersion

Review status

reviewed

Is version of

Citation

Campbell, J., Chen, Y., & Azhar, M. (in press). Not toeing the number line for simple arithmetic: Two large-n conceptual replications of Mathieu et al. (Cognition, 2016, Experiment 1) [Author accepted manuscript]. Journal of Numerical Cognition. http://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.4953
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Campbell, Jamie
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Chen, Yalin
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Azhar, Maham
  • PsychArchives acquisition timestamp
    2021-07-01T12:47:37Z
  • Made available on
    2021-07-01T12:47:37Z
  • Date of first publication
    2021-07-01
  • Abstract / Description
    We conducted two conceptual replications of Experiment 1 in Mathieu, Gourjon, Couderc, Thevenot, and Prado (2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.10.002). They tested a sample of 34 French adults on mixed-operation blocks of single-digit addition (4 + 3) and subtraction (4 – 3) with the three problem elements (O1, +/-, O2) presented sequentially. Addition was 34 ms faster if O2 appeared 300 ms after the operation sign and displaced 5o to the right of central fixation, whereas subtraction was 19 ms faster when O2 was displaced to the left. Replication Experiment 1 (n = 74 recruited at the University of Saskatchewan) used the same non-zero addition and subtraction problems and trial event sequence as Mathieu et al., but participants completed blocks of pure addition and pure subtraction followed by the mixed-operation condition used by Mathieu et al. Addition RT showed a 32 ms advantage with O2 shifted rightward relative to leftward but only in mixed-operation blocks. There was no effect of O2 position on subtraction RT. Experiment 2 (n = 74) was the same except mixed-operation blocks occurred before the pure-operation blocks. There was an overall 13 ms advantage with O2 shifted right relative to leftward but no interaction with operation or with mixture (i.e., pure vs mixed operations). Nonetheless, the rightward RT advantage was statistically significant for both addition and subtraction only in mixed-operation blocks. Taken together with the robust effects of mixture in Experiment 1, the results suggest that O2 position effects in this paradigm might reflect task specific demands associated with mixed operations.
    en_US
  • Publication status
    acceptedVersion
  • Review status
    reviewed
  • Sponsorship
    This work was supported by a Discovery Grant awarded to Jamie Campbell by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.
    en_US
  • Citation
    Campbell, J., Chen, Y., & Azhar, M. (in press). Not toeing the number line for simple arithmetic: Two large-n conceptual replications of Mathieu et al. (Cognition, 2016, Experiment 1) [Author accepted manuscript]. Journal of Numerical Cognition. http://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.4953
    en_US
  • ISSN
    2363-8761
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/4381
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.4953
  • Language of content
    eng
    en_US
  • Publisher
    PsychArchives
    en_US
  • Is version of
    https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.6051
  • Is version of
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.6104
  • Is related to
    http://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.5221
  • Is related to
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.6104
  • Keyword(s)
    replication
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    simple addition and subtraction
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    spatial attention
    en_US
  • Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)
    150
  • Title
    Not Toeing the Number Line for Simple Arithmetic: Two Large-n Conceptual Replications of Mathieu et al. (Cognition, 2016, Experiment 1)
    en_US
  • DRO type
    article
    en_US
  • Journal title
    Journal of Numerical Cognition
  • Visible tag(s)
    PsychOpen GOLD
    en_US
  • Visible tag(s)
    Accepted Manuscript
    en_US