Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.4879
Title: Conducted as planned? A detailed comparison of studies and their preregistered plans
Authors: Spitzer, Lisa
Weaver, Emma
Rehbein, Sophia
Issue Date: 2-Jun-2021
Publisher: PsychArchives
Abstract: The goal of this study is to investigate whether most of the deviations today still occur in the methodological aspects of sample size, exclusion criteria, and analysis, as in the study by Claesen and Gomes (2019). Claesen and Gomes (2019) examined published studies for deviations from their preregistrations. The study by Claesen and Gomes (2019) serves as the basis for this study, although deviations will be considered in more detail in this study. Across the various methodological aspects (hypothesis/research question, variables, sample size, exclusion criteria, analysis), the goal is to look at what changes were added, omitted, or modified from the preregistration to the published study. Another goal of this study is to be able to determine whether researchers are now better adhering to their preregistration and whether there are fewer deviations by comparing the study by Claesen and Gomes (2019) and this study.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/4314
http://dx.doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.4879
Citation: Spitzer, L., Weaver, E., & Rehbein, S. (2021). Conducted as planned? A detailed comparison of studies and their preregistered plans. PsychArchives. https://doi.org/10.23668/PSYCHARCHIVES.4879
Appears in Collections:Preregistration

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
Exposé _ Präreg_Final.pdf
Public Use
225,04 kBAdobe PDFDownload


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons