Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.4229
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.rights.licenseCC-BY 4.0en_US
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Tânia R.-
dc.contributor.authorCastro, Paula-
dc.contributor.authorGuerra, Rita-
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-16T14:59:27Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-16T14:59:27Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationSantos, T. R., Castro, P., & Guerra, R. (2020). Supplementary materials to: Is the press presenting (neoliberal) foreign residency laws in a depoliticised way? The case of investment visas and the reconfiguring of citizenship. PsychOpen. https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.4229en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/3841-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.4229-
dc.description.abstractSupplementary materials to: Santos, T. R., Castro, P., & Guerra, R. (2020). Is the press presenting (neoliberal) foreign residency laws in a depoliticised way? The case of investment visas and the reconfiguring of citizenship. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 8(2), ##-##. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v8i2.1298en_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsThe supplementary materials contain the original output yielded by IRaMuTeQ software in the first stage of analysis and a detailed table with the sub-categories used in defining arguments in the second stage of analysis: S1. Original IRaMuTeQ Output of the Factorial Correspondence Analysis; S2. Detailed Table with Number of Arguments in Favour of or Against Investment Visas According to Sub-Category Type.-
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherPsychOpenen_US
dc.relation.isreferencedbyhttps://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v8i2.1298-
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v8i2.1298-
dc.rightsopenAccessen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.subjectsocial psychology of citizenshipen_US
dc.subjectlegal innovationen_US
dc.subjectdepoliticisationen_US
dc.subjectneoliberalismen_US
dc.subjectinvestment visasen_US
dc.subjectChinese migrantsen_US
dc.subject.ddc150-
dc.titleSupplementary materials to: Is the press presenting (neoliberal) foreign residency laws in a depoliticised way? The case of investment visas and the reconfiguring of citizenshipen_US
dc.typesupplementen_US
dc.description.reviewnotReviewed-
dc.description.pubstatuspublishedVersion-
Appears in Collections:Supplements



This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons