This is not the latest version of this Digital Research Object (DRO). The latest version can be found here!
Code

Code for: Top-down and bottom-up influences on dynamic visual attention: Attentional Capture in Multiple Object Tracking

Author(s) / Creator(s)

Pichlmeier, Sebastian
Pfeiffer, Till

Abstract / Description

Code for: Top-down and bottom-up influences on dynamic visual attention: Attentional Capture in Multiple Object Tracking
Multiple Object Tracking (MOT) is assumed to be handled by bottom-up (e.g. Pylyshsyn & Storm, 1988) or top-down processes of selection (e.g. Yantis, 1992) or both (e.g. Oksama & Hyönä, 2008) – depending on the model assumed. The Attentional Capture (AC) paradigm (e.g. Yantis & Jonides, 1984) is regularly employed to demonstrate influences of bottom-up and/or top-down attentional control. It has up to now not been used to assess influences of irrelevant stimuli in MOT. We investigated whether AC does occur in MOT: Are irrelevant stimuli processed at all in dynamic attentional tasks? We found that sudden onset singletons were effective in lowering probe detection thus demonstrating AC. Tracking performance as dependent measure was not affected. The AC effect persisted in conditions of higher tracking load (experiment 2) and was dramatically increased in lower presentation frequency (experiment 3). Tracking performance was shown to suffer only when irrelevant distractors were presented serially with very short time gaps in between thus effectively disturbing reengaging attention on the tracking set (experiment 4). We discuss that a stable representation of the tracking array in visual working memory and rapid dis- and reengagement of attention allow managing strong disruptions of tracking.

Persistent Identifier

Date of first publication

2021-01-18

Publisher

PsychArchives

Citation

Pichlmeier, S., & Pfeiffer, T. (2021). Code for: Automatic Covert Attentional Capture in Multiple Object Tracking. PsychArchives. http://dx.doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.4482
  • 3
    2021-06-08
    Updated as of June 8th, 2021; includes updated R-code for analysis.
  • 2
    2021-01-18
    Updated as of January 18th, 2021; includes updated R-code for analysis.
  • 1
    2020-06-17
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Pichlmeier, Sebastian
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Pfeiffer, Till
  • PsychArchives acquisition timestamp
    2021-01-18T16:35:37Z
  • Made available on
    2020-06-17T16:46:28Z
  • Made available on
    2021-01-18T16:35:37Z
  • Date of first publication
    2021-01-18
  • Abstract / Description
    Code for: Top-down and bottom-up influences on dynamic visual attention: Attentional Capture in Multiple Object Tracking
    en
  • Abstract / Description
    Multiple Object Tracking (MOT) is assumed to be handled by bottom-up (e.g. Pylyshsyn & Storm, 1988) or top-down processes of selection (e.g. Yantis, 1992) or both (e.g. Oksama & Hyönä, 2008) – depending on the model assumed. The Attentional Capture (AC) paradigm (e.g. Yantis & Jonides, 1984) is regularly employed to demonstrate influences of bottom-up and/or top-down attentional control. It has up to now not been used to assess influences of irrelevant stimuli in MOT. We investigated whether AC does occur in MOT: Are irrelevant stimuli processed at all in dynamic attentional tasks? We found that sudden onset singletons were effective in lowering probe detection thus demonstrating AC. Tracking performance as dependent measure was not affected. The AC effect persisted in conditions of higher tracking load (experiment 2) and was dramatically increased in lower presentation frequency (experiment 3). Tracking performance was shown to suffer only when irrelevant distractors were presented serially with very short time gaps in between thus effectively disturbing reengaging attention on the tracking set (experiment 4). We discuss that a stable representation of the tracking array in visual working memory and rapid dis- and reengagement of attention allow managing strong disruptions of tracking.
    en
  • Citation
    Pichlmeier, S., & Pfeiffer, T. (2021). Code for: Automatic Covert Attentional Capture in Multiple Object Tracking. PsychArchives. http://dx.doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.4482
    en
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/2698.2
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.4482
  • Language of content
    mul
  • Publisher
    PsychArchives
    en
  • Is related to
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.4481
  • Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)
    150
  • Title
    Code for: Top-down and bottom-up influences on dynamic visual attention: Attentional Capture in Multiple Object Tracking
    en
  • DRO type
    code
    en