Notice This is not the latest version of this item. The latest version can be found at: http://dx.doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.4889
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.4482
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.rights.licenseLGPL 3.0-
dc.contributor.authorPichlmeier, Sebastian-
dc.contributor.authorPfeiffer, Till-
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-18T16:35:37Z-
dc.date.available2020-06-17T16:46:28Z-
dc.date.available2021-01-18T16:35:37Z-
dc.date.issued2021-01-18-
dc.identifier.citationPichlmeier, S., & Pfeiffer, T. (2021). Code for: Automatic Covert Attentional Capture in Multiple Object Tracking. PsychArchives. http://dx.doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.4482en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/2698.2-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.4482-
dc.description.abstractCode for: Top-down and bottom-up influences on dynamic visual attention: Attentional Capture in Multiple Object Trackingen
dc.description.abstractMultiple Object Tracking (MOT) is assumed to be handled by bottom-up (e.g. Pylyshsyn & Storm, 1988) or top-down processes of selection (e.g. Yantis, 1992) or both (e.g. Oksama & Hyönä, 2008) – depending on the model assumed. The Attentional Capture (AC) paradigm (e.g. Yantis & Jonides, 1984) is regularly employed to demonstrate influences of bottom-up and/or top-down attentional control. It has up to now not been used to assess influences of irrelevant stimuli in MOT. We investigated whether AC does occur in MOT: Are irrelevant stimuli processed at all in dynamic attentional tasks? We found that sudden onset singletons were effective in lowering probe detection thus demonstrating AC. Tracking performance as dependent measure was not affected. The AC effect persisted in conditions of higher tracking load (experiment 2) and was dramatically increased in lower presentation frequency (experiment 3). Tracking performance was shown to suffer only when irrelevant distractors were presented serially with very short time gaps in between thus effectively disturbing reengaging attention on the tracking set (experiment 4). We discuss that a stable representation of the tracking array in visual working memory and rapid dis- and reengagement of attention allow managing strong disruptions of tracking.en
dc.language.isomul-
dc.publisherPsychArchivesen
dc.relation.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.4481-
dc.rightsopenAccessen
dc.rights.urihttps://opensource.org/licenses/LGPL-3.0-
dc.subject.ddc150-
dc.titleCode for: Top-down and bottom-up influences on dynamic visual attention: Attentional Capture in Multiple Object Trackingen
dc.typecodeen
Appears in Collections:Code

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Top-down and bottom-up influences on dynamic visual attention.R
Public Use
R code44,24 kBR scriptDownload

Version History
Version Item Date Summary
3 10.23668/psycharchives.4889 2021-06-08 16:40:00.78 Updated as of June 8th, 2021; includes updated R-code for analysis.
2 10.23668/psycharchives.4482 2021-01-18 17:33:06.954 Updated as of January 18th, 2021; includes updated R-code for analysis.
1 10.23668/psycharchives.3081 2020-06-17 18:46:28.0