This is not the latest version of this Digital Research Object (DRO). The latest version can be found here!
Research Data

Dataset: Automatic Covert Attentional Capture in Multiple Object Tracking

Author(s) / Creator(s)

Pichlmeier, Sebastian
Pfeiffer, Till

Abstract / Description

Multiple Object Tracking (MOT) is assumed to be handled by bottom-up (e.g. Pylyshsyn & Storm, 1988) or top-down processes of selection (e.g. Yantis, 1992) or both (e.g. Oksama & Hyönä, 2008) – depending on the model assumed. The Attentional Capture (AC) paradigm (e.g. Yantis & Jonides, 1984) is regularly employed to demonstrate influences of bottom-up and/or top-down attentional control. It has up to now not been used to assess influences of irrelevant stimuli in MOT. We investigated whether AC does occur in MOT: Are irrelevant stimuli processed at all in dynamic attentional tasks? We found that sudden onset singletons were effective in lowering probe detection thus demonstrating AC. Tracking performance as dependent measure was not affected. The AC effect persisted in conditions of higher tracking load (experiment 2) and was dramatically increased in lower presentation frequency (experiment 3). We discuss that a stable representation of the tracking array in visual working memory allows managing strong disruptions of attention during tracking.

Persistent Identifier

Date of first publication

2020-06-15

Publisher

PsychArchives

Citation

Pichlmeier, S., & Pfeiffer, T. (2020). Dataset: Automatic Covert Attentional Capture in Multiple Object Tracking. PsychArchives. https://doi.org/10.23668/PSYCHARCHIVES.3078
  • 3
    2021-06-08
    Updated as of June 8th, 2021: Due to a general revision of the related research report, title and abstract were modified. The data set itself is unchanged.
  • 2
    2021-01-18
    Updated as of January 18th, 2021; includes updated analysis of experiment 3 on basis of a broadened data base, new experiment 4, and updated abstract.
  • 1
    2020-06-15
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Pichlmeier, Sebastian
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Pfeiffer, Till
  • PsychArchives acquisition timestamp
    2020-06-15T15:25:22Z
  • Made available on
    2020-06-15T15:25:22Z
  • Date of first publication
    2020-06-15
  • Abstract / Description
    Multiple Object Tracking (MOT) is assumed to be handled by bottom-up (e.g. Pylyshsyn & Storm, 1988) or top-down processes of selection (e.g. Yantis, 1992) or both (e.g. Oksama & Hyönä, 2008) – depending on the model assumed. The Attentional Capture (AC) paradigm (e.g. Yantis & Jonides, 1984) is regularly employed to demonstrate influences of bottom-up and/or top-down attentional control. It has up to now not been used to assess influences of irrelevant stimuli in MOT. We investigated whether AC does occur in MOT: Are irrelevant stimuli processed at all in dynamic attentional tasks? We found that sudden onset singletons were effective in lowering probe detection thus demonstrating AC. Tracking performance as dependent measure was not affected. The AC effect persisted in conditions of higher tracking load (experiment 2) and was dramatically increased in lower presentation frequency (experiment 3). We discuss that a stable representation of the tracking array in visual working memory allows managing strong disruptions of attention during tracking.
    en
  • Review status
    unknown
    en
  • Citation
    Pichlmeier, S., & Pfeiffer, T. (2020). Dataset: Automatic Covert Attentional Capture in Multiple Object Tracking. PsychArchives. https://doi.org/10.23668/PSYCHARCHIVES.3078
    en
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/2696
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.3078
  • Language of content
    eng
  • Publisher
    PsychArchives
    en
  • Is related to
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.3081
  • Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)
    150
  • Title
    Dataset: Automatic Covert Attentional Capture in Multiple Object Tracking
    en
  • DRO type
    researchData
    en