Dataset for: Detection versus Discrimination: The Limits of Binding Accounts in Action Control
Author(s) / Creator(s)
Schöpper, Lars-Michael
Hilchey, Matthew D.
Lappe, Markus
Frings, Christian
Abstract / Description
Dataset for: Schöpper, L., Hilchey, M.D., Lappe, M. et al. Detection versus discrimination: The limits of binding accounts in action control. Atten Percept Psychophys 82, 2085–2097 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01911-4
Dataset for the study "Detection versus Discrimination: The Limits of Binding Accounts in Action Control", to-be-published in Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. For further information please refer to the aforementioned paper. The aggregated data files can be analyzed by using the respective SPSS-Syntax available under "Code for: Detection versus Discrimination: The Limits of Binding Accounts in Action Control" to perform the analysis reported in the paper.
Actions can be investigated by using sequential priming tasks, in which participants respond to prime and probe targets (sometimes accompanied by distractors). Facilitation and interference from prime to probe are measured by repeating, changing, or partially repeating features or responses between prime and probe. According to the action control literature, feature-feature or feature-response bindings are universal and apply for all actions. The attentional orienting literature, however, suggests that if the task is to detect stimuli, such binding effects may be absent. In two experiments, we compared performance in a discrimination task and a detection task with the exact same perceptual setup of prime-probe sequences. For the discrimination task, we replicated the typical feature-response binding pattern. Crucially, we did not observe any binding effects for the detection task, which can be explained by task-specific processes or fast response execution. These results reveal an important boundary of current binding models in action control.
Keyword(s)
Action control Attention Perception Stimulus–response bindingPersistent Identifier
Date of first publication
2019-10
Publisher
PsychArchives
Is referenced by
Citation
Schöpper, L.-M., Hilchey, M. D., Lappe, M., & Frings, C. (2019, October). Dataset for: Detection versus Discrimination: The Limits of Binding Accounts in Action Control. PsychArchives. https://doi.org/10.23668/PSYCHARCHIVES.2630
-
Experiment1_DIVAL1_Aggregated_50_1.5.txtText - 4.1KBMD5: 294d55f7349d2bc748f1b416298a6e2dDescription: Aggregated data after applying cut-off criteria as reported in the paper
-
Experiment1_DIVAL1_AllRawData.txtText - 18.13MBMD5: 3943714dabfd0c96785b5c65f2894e5bDescription: All raw data, including practice and catch trials; please note that practice and catch trials were excluded from analysis (see paper)
-
Experiment1_DIVAL1_ForAnalysis.txtText - 1.16MBMD5: 37846a1ae4be04952dc7fc01c68e195aDescription: Data for analysis (i.e., without practice and catch trials; columns irrelevant for analysis were filtered out)
-
Experiment2_DIVAL2_Aggregated_50_1.5.txtText - 4.14KBMD5: ed9663188f8574ad00fdc0968cb977a4Description: Aggregated data after applying cut-off criteria as reported in the paper
-
Experiment2_DIVAL2_AllRawData.txtText - 18.06MBMD5: 5ba5333f6e949c6c9498b12a3bc001d3Description: All raw data, including practice and catch trials; please note that practice and catch trials were excluded from analysis (see paper)
-
Experiment2_DIVAL2_ForAnalysis.txtText - 1.24MBMD5: 70f2bf3dc913e3875200882694e9e8efDescription: Data for analysis (i.e., without practice and catch trials; columns irrelevant for analysis were filtered out)
-
ReadMe.pdfAdobe PDF - 195.94KBMD5: 86a3c807e7617f9ced1dd3428260610bDescription: ReadMe file
-
There are no other versions of this object.
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Schöpper, Lars-Michael
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Hilchey, Matthew D.
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Lappe, Markus
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Frings, Christian
-
PsychArchives acquisition timestamp2019-10-24T08:37:10Z
-
Made available on2019-10-24T08:37:10Z
-
Date of first publication2019-10
-
Abstract / DescriptionDataset for: Schöpper, L., Hilchey, M.D., Lappe, M. et al. Detection versus discrimination: The limits of binding accounts in action control. Atten Percept Psychophys 82, 2085–2097 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01911-4en
-
Abstract / DescriptionDataset for the study "Detection versus Discrimination: The Limits of Binding Accounts in Action Control", to-be-published in Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. For further information please refer to the aforementioned paper. The aggregated data files can be analyzed by using the respective SPSS-Syntax available under "Code for: Detection versus Discrimination: The Limits of Binding Accounts in Action Control" to perform the analysis reported in the paper.
-
Abstract / DescriptionActions can be investigated by using sequential priming tasks, in which participants respond to prime and probe targets (sometimes accompanied by distractors). Facilitation and interference from prime to probe are measured by repeating, changing, or partially repeating features or responses between prime and probe. According to the action control literature, feature-feature or feature-response bindings are universal and apply for all actions. The attentional orienting literature, however, suggests that if the task is to detect stimuli, such binding effects may be absent. In two experiments, we compared performance in a discrimination task and a detection task with the exact same perceptual setup of prime-probe sequences. For the discrimination task, we replicated the typical feature-response binding pattern. Crucially, we did not observe any binding effects for the detection task, which can be explained by task-specific processes or fast response execution. These results reveal an important boundary of current binding models in action control.en
-
CitationSchöpper, L.-M., Hilchey, M. D., Lappe, M., & Frings, C. (2019, October). Dataset for: Detection versus Discrimination: The Limits of Binding Accounts in Action Control. PsychArchives. https://doi.org/10.23668/PSYCHARCHIVES.2630en
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/2249
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.2630
-
Language of contenteng
-
PublisherPsychArchivesen
-
Is referenced byhttps://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01911-4
-
Is related tohttps://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.2631
-
Is related tohttps://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01911-4
-
Keyword(s)Action controlen
-
Keyword(s)Attentionen
-
Keyword(s)Perceptionen
-
Keyword(s)Stimulus–response bindingen
-
Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)150
-
TitleDataset for: Detection versus Discrimination: The Limits of Binding Accounts in Action Controlen
-
DRO typeresearchDataen